20 U.S.C. § 122
Limitation on use of appropriations
No part of the appropriations made by Congress for the Howard University shall be used, directly or indirectly, for the support of the theological department of said university, nor for the support of any sectarian, denominational, or religious instruction therein; and no part thereof shall be paid to said university until it shall accord to the Secretary of Education, or to his designated agent or agents, authority to visit and inspect such university and to control and supervise the expenditure therein of all moneys paid under said appropriations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1967–1977 · leading case: Giles v. Howard Univ., 428 F. Supp. 603 (D.D.C. 1977).
Giles v. Howard Univ., 428 F. Supp. 603 (D.D.C. 1977). “In the Memorandum supporting his application for a temporary restraining order, the plaintiff tried to distinguish his case by arguing that previous decisions had not considered a federal statute that authorizes the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to “control and…”
Greene v. Howard Univ., 271 F. Supp. 609 (D.D.C. 1967). “As a condition of receiving such money, the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare is given authority to visit and inspect Howard University and to control and supervise the expenditures of those funds which have been appropriated by Congress, 20 U.S.C. § 122 . In addition,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.