20 U.S.C. § 1226
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title II, § 212(a)(1), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3913
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1931–1975 · leading case: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Weinberger, 367 F. Supp. 1378 (D.D.C. 1973).
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Weinberger, 367 F. Supp. 1378 (D.D.C. 1973). “Section 415 of the General Education Provisions Act, 23 20 U.S.C. § 1226 , contains the controlling language which has now been repeatedly held 24 to express Congressional intent to mandate full funding of ongoing programs: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, unless…”
Nat'l Council of Cmty. Mental Health Centers, Inc. v. Weinberger, 361 F. Supp. 897 (D.D.C. 1973). “See 20 U.S.C. § 1226 and 23 U.S.C. § 118 (a) ; S.”
State High. Comm'n of Missouri v. Volpe, 479 F.2d 1099 (8th Cir. 1973). “1094 , 20 U.S.C. § 1226 (1970). Although the committee reports do not satisfactorily explain this section, comments during debate on the floor indicate that the language of Section 406 was intended to prevent the withholding of any funds.”
State of Louisiana v. Weinberger, 369 F. Supp. 856 (E.D. La. 1973). “Discussion of this provision during the acceptance of the conference report on the Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1969 makes clear that that act in no way overrides the effect of section 406.”
City of Los Angeles v. Coleman, 397 F. Supp. 547 (D.D.C. 1975). “Section 415 of the General Education Provisions’ Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1226 , quoted in 367 F.Supp. at 1381 .”
Brampton Woolen Co. v. Field, 55 F.2d 325 (D.N.H. 1931). “The petationcr having first elected to pursue its remedy through the administrative board provided by Congress from which the exclusive right of appeal is to the Circuit Court of Appeals (Revenue Act 1026, § 1003 [20 USCA § 1226]) it is bound by its election, and tins court will…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.