20 U.S.C. § 1652

Repealed. Pub. L. 117–328, div. H, title III, § 313, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4898

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1972–1987 · leading case: Uniontown Area Sch. Dist. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm'n, 313 A.2d 156 (Pa. 1973).
Uniontown Area Sch. Dist. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm'n, 313 A.2d 156 (Pa. 1973). “VIII, 802(a), 20 U.S.C.A. §1652 (a) (Supp. 1973). It is possible, therefore, that federal funds may be unavailable to defray the cost of whatever transportation of pupils may be incurred in complying with the orders of the Commission.”
Kelley v. Metro. Cnty. Bd. of Educ., Tenn., 372 F. Supp. 540 (M.D. Tenn. 1973). · cites it 2× “” 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (a). The use of ESAA funds for busing was authorized, therefore, in those cases where the school officials had voluntarily requested funds for such an activity and where the transportation was not for the purpose of achieving a racial balance in the schools.”
Drummond Et Al. v. Acree Et Al., 409 U.S. 1228 (1972). “” Education Amendments of 1972, § 802 (a), 20 U. S. C. § 1652 (a) (1970 ed., Supp. II) (emphasis added).”
Carroll v. Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 410 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Ky. 1976). · cites it 3× “Chapter 157A, should be computed on the basis of transportation of students within that district to the nearest school available to them; and (2) Title 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (a), Title 20 U.S.C. § 1228 and Section 315(b) *237 of P.”
Bd. of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of Cincinnati v. Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 655 F. Supp. 1504 (S.D. Ohio 1987). “” 20 U.S.C. § 1652 (1974 Supp. IV). 12. The Emergency School Aid Act grants were administered by HEW’s Assistant Secretary for Education.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.