20 U.S.C. § 1683
Judicial review
Any department or agency action taken pursuant to section 1682 of this title shall be subject to such judicial review as may otherwise be provided by law for similar action taken by such department or agency on other grounds. In the case of action, not otherwise subject to judicial review, terminating or refusing to grant or to continue financial assistance upon a finding of failure to comply with any requirement imposed pursuant to section 1682 of this title, any person aggrieved (including any State or political subdivision thereof and any agency of either) may obtain judicial review of such action in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5, and such action shall not be deemed committed to unreviewable agency discretion within the meaning of section 701 of that title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (1979).
Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (1979). “374 , as set forth in 20 U. S. C. § 1683 , provides for judicial review of actions taken under § 902: "Any department or agency action taken pursuant to section 1682 of this title shall be subject to such judicial review as may otherwise be provided by law for similar action…”
State of Tenn. v. Dep't of Educ., 104 F.4th 577 (6th Cir. 2024). “20 U.S.C. § 1683 . Looking at the plain text, it’s clear that there is more than one path to some type of judicial review.”
Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 309 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir. 2002). “374 , as set forth in 20 U.S.C. § 1683 , provides for judicial review of "[a]ny department or agency action taken pursuant to section [902].”
Nat'l Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Educ., 263 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D.D.C. 2003). “20 U.S.C. § 1683 (2003). Further, “private lawsuits have played an important role in Title IX enforcement.”
Bd. of Educ. v. United States Dep't of Educ., 208 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. Ohio 2016). “A district is entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge followed by an administrative appeal and discretionary review by the Secretary of Education.”
Romeo Cmty. Schs. v. United States Dep't of Health, Educ., & Welfare, 438 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. Mich. 1977). “” 20 U.S.C. § 1683 . 8 Plaintiff has made out a valid case for pre-enforcement relief, and defendant’s motion to dismiss must accordingly be denied.”
Neil Jacobson v. Delta Airlines, Inc., a Georgia Corp., & Hugh Burton, Individually & as Customer Serv. Supervisor of Delta Airlines, 742 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1984). “§ 2000d-l (1982) (Title VI), and section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1683 (1982) (Title IX). See S.”
Org. of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R.R., 579 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Ill. 1983). “20 U.S.C. § 1683 ; 45 U.S.C. § 803 (e). The Cannon Court also examined the legislative history of Title IX.”
Hillsdale Coll. v. Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 696 F.2d 418 (6th Cir. 1982). “20 U.S.C. § 1683 (1976). I. Introduction Hillsdale College is a private, nonsectarian, coeducational college located in Hills-dale, Michigan with an enrollment of approximately 1,000 students.”
Alexander v. Yale Univ., 459 F. Supp. 1 (D. Conn. 1977). “§ 1682 , but plaintiffs have not attempted resort to the responsible enforcing agency, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.”
Univ. of Richmond v. Bell, 543 F. Supp. 321 (E.D. Va. 1982). “The parties have filed a joint stipulation of fact and have submitted the matter for a decision on the merits through cross-motions for summary judgment.”
Grove City Coll. Ex Rel. Sickafuse v. Harris, 500 F. Supp. 253 (W.D. Pa. 1980). “IS THIS MATTER RIPE FOR A JUDICIAL CONSIDERATION BY THIS COURT? Title 20 U.S.C. § 1683 (Title IX) provides for judicial review of final agency action, *263 however, HEW contends that the matter is not ripe for judicial determination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.