When a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a school system is desegregated, or that it meets the constitutional requirements, or that it is a unitary system, or that it has no vestiges of a dual system, and thereafter residential shifts in population occur which result in school population changes in any school within such a desegregated school system, such school population changes so occurring shall not, per se, constitute a cause for civil action for a new plan of desegregation or for modification of the court approved plan.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 2019–2019 · leading case:
Collins v. Thurmond, No. F075781 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2019).
Collins v. Thurmond, No. F075781 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2019).
“(See 20 U.S.C. §§ 1707 [“[w]hen a court of competent jurisdiction determines”], 1718 [“[t]he court of initial jurisdiction”].”
Collins v. Thurmond, No. F075781M (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2019).
“(See 20 U.S.C. §§ 1707 [“[w]hen a court of competent jurisdiction determines”], 1718 [“[t]he court of initial jurisdiction”].”
Collins v. Thurmond, No. F075781A (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2019).
“(See 20 U.S.C. §§ 1707 [“[w]hen a court of competent jurisdiction determines”], 1718 [“[t]he court of initial jurisdiction”].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.