20 U.S.C. § 1710

Civil actions by Attorney General; notice of violations; certification respecting undertaking appropriate remedial action

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar
The Attorney General shall not institute a civil action under section 1706 of this title before he—(a) gives to the appropriate educational agency notice of the condition or conditions which, in his judgment, constitute a violation of part 2 of this subchapter; and(b) certifies to the appropriate district court of the United States that he is satisfied that such educational agency has not, within a reasonable time after such notice, undertaken appropriate remedial action.(Pub. L. 93–380, title II, § 211, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 516.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective on and after sixtieth day after Aug. 21, 1974, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 93–380, set out as a note under section 1221–1 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1980 · leading case: Monell v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978).
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978). · cites it 2× “516 , as set forth in 20 U. S. C. § 1710 (1976 ed.), provides: "The Attorney General shall not institute a civil action under section 1706 of this title [which allows for suit by both private parties and the Attorney General to redress discrimination in public education] before…”
United States v. Sch. Dist. of the City of Ferndale, Michigan, 616 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “20 U.S.C. § 1710 . The District Court found that the certificate filed by the Attorney General under subsection (b) “indicate[d] that the local school authorities, but not the State defendants, had been notified.”
United States v. Sch. Dist. of Ferndale, Mich., 400 F. Supp. 1122 (E.D. Mich. 1975). · cites it 2× “As required by 20 U.S.C. § 1710 , the Attorney General has given notice to the appropriate educational agency of the alleged violations and certification to the Court that the educational agency has not taken appropriate remedial action.”
United States v. Price, 577 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1978). “20 U.S.C. § 1710 . The District Court found that the certificate filed by the Attorney General under subsection (b) “indicate[d] that the local school authorities, but not the State defendants, had been notified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.