20 U.S.C. § 1717

Reopening proceedings

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

A parent or guardian of a child, or parents or guardians of children similarly situated, transported to a public school in accordance with a court order, or an educational agency subject to a court order or a desegregation plan under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.] in effect on August 21, 1974, and intended to end segregation of students on the basis of race, color, or national origin, may seek to reopen or intervene in the further implementation of such court order, currently in effect, if the time or distance of travel is so great as to risk the health of the student or significantly impinge on his or her educational process.

Notes of Decisions
United States v. The State of Mississippi, the State of Mississippi & the Newton Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. The Hickory Improvement Ass'n, Etc., 958 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1992). · cites it 13× “Discussion The Association asserted three alternative bases for intervention under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: first, that 20 U.S.C. § 1717 provides an unconditional right of intervention under Fed.”
United States v. Union Elec. Co., 64 F.3d 1152 (8th Cir. 1995). · cites it 2× “1992) (contrasting 20 U.S.C. § 1717 , which provides that "a parent or guardian of a child .”
U.S. v. State of Miss. (5th Cir. 1992). · cites it 10× “Discussion The Association asserted three alternative bases for intervention under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: first, that 20 U.S.C. § 1717 provides an unconditional right of intervention under Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.