20 U.S.C. § 1753
Uniform rules of evidence requirement
The rules of evidence required to prove that State or local authorities are practicing racial discrimination in assigning students to public schools shall be uniform throughout the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: Stanley v. Darlington Cnty. Sch. Dist., 879 F. Supp. 1341 (D.S.C. 1995).
Stanley v. Darlington Cnty. Sch. Dist., 879 F. Supp. 1341 (D.S.C. 1995). “” Such uniformity in the rules of evidence can be accomplished only if the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over EEOA cases, because Congress cannot mandate rules of evidence for state courts.”
Sch. Dist. of Saginaw v. United States Dep't of Health, Educ., & Welfare, 431 F. Supp. 147 (E.D. Mich. 1977). “§ 2000d-6(a) and 20 U.S.C. § 1753 . Plaintiffs do not assert in this regard that there have been enacted different regulations and procedures for various parts of the country.”
United States v. Sch. Dist. of Ferndale, Mich., 400 F. Supp. 1141 (E.D. Mich. 1975). “However, this fact should weigh against the application of collateral estoppel, given the requirement imposed by Congress in 20 U.S.C. § 1753 that “The rules of evidence required to prove that State or local authorities are practicing racial discrimination in assigning students…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.