20 U.S.C. § 3601
Congressional statement of findings and purposes
Section 1221 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), was amended generally by Pub. L. 103–382, title II, § 211,
Pub. L. 96–270, § 1,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co., 578 N.E.2d 926 (Ill. 1991).
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co., 578 N.E.2d 926 (Ill. 1991). “, 20 U.S.C. §3601 et seq. (1988); 40 C.F.R.”
City of New York v. Keene Corp., 132 Misc. 2d 745 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1986). “) and the regulations promulgated under it, (3) the Asbestos School Hazard Detection and Control Act ( 20 USC § 3601 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated under it, (4) the Toxic Substance and Control Act ( 15 USC § 2605 et seq.”
United States v. Certified Env't Servs., Inc., 753 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2014). “” 20 U.S.C. § 3601 (a)(3). Its complete removal is therefore required by both federal and state regulations.”
O'Brien v. Bellevue Pub. Schs., 289 Neb. 637 (Neb. 2014). “(2012); and (3) the Asbestos School Hazard Detection and Control Act of 1980, 20 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (2012). The Court of Appeals stated that for the sake of completeness under our plain error review of the public policy exception to at-will employment, we have reviewed the…”
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 802 A.2d 1070 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2002). “Concern over the effects of exposure to asbestos fibers has resulted in a maze of Federal and State regulations requiring local educational facilities and olher public building owners to identify the presence of asbestos in their buildings and take corrective measures to contain…”
James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. & Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 750 F.2d 1314 (5th Cir. 1985). “20 U.S.C. § 3601 (a)(3)(6). See Report of the Attorney General on Asbestos Liability, House Comm.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 197 v. W.R. Grace & Co., 752 F. Supp. 286 (D. Minnesota 1990). “See Asbestos School Hazard Detection and Control Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3601 , et seq.; Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Act of 1984, 20 U.”
Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp., 759 F.2d 271 (3rd Cir. 1985). “20 U.S.C. § 3601 (a)(3)(6). It is estimated that at least 14,000 schools will be affected.”
Sch. Dist. of Lancaster v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 789 F.2d 996 (3rd Cir. 1986). “For other legislative responses to asbestos in the schools, see 20 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. § 4011 et seq.”
Barnett v. City of Yonkers, 731 F. Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “Similarly, in enacting the Asbestos School Hazard Detection and Control Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq. (“Asbestos Act”), Congress found that: “[d]uring the period 1946 to 1972, asbestos materials, particularly in sprayed form, were used extensively in the construction and…”
Wallis v. Baldwin, 70 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 1995). “, 20 U.S.C. §§ 3601 (a)(3), 4011(a)(3) (noting the Congressional finding that medical science has not established any minimum level of exposure to asbestos considered safe).”
Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Cont'l Insur. Co, 299 F. App'x 850 (11th Cir. 2008). “See generally 20 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. The first asbestos-related property-damage suits were filed in 1980, but Celotex was not a party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.