20 U.S.C. § 7372

Rule of construction on equalized spending

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to mandate equalized spending per pupil for a State, local educational agency, or school.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000). · cites it 10× “3d, at 1464, and allocations to private schools must "be equal (consistent with the number of children to be served) to expenditures for programs under this subchapter for children enrolled in the public schools of the [LEA]," 20 U. S. C. § 7372 (b). LEA's must provide Chapter 2…”

Helms v. Picard, 151 F.3d 347 (5th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3× “20 U.S.C. § 7372 (a)(1). Chapter 2 funds for the innovative assistance programs must supplement, and in no case supplant, “funds from non-Federal sources.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.