20 U.S.C. § 751
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1966–2000 · leading case: Virginia Coll. Bldg. Auth. v. Lynn, 538 S.E.2d 682 (Va. 2000).
Virginia Coll. Bldg. Auth. v. Lynn, 538 S.E.2d 682 (Va. 2000). “See 20 U.S.C.A. § 751 (a)(2). This distinction is the difference between an institution `whose primary service is to the state and community and one whose primary service is to a religious or denominational group.”
Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672 (1971). “" 20 U. S. C. § 751 (a) (1964 ed., Supp. V).”
Tilton v. Finch, 312 F. Supp. 1191 (D. Conn. 1970). “20 U.S.C. § 751 (f) (1964). (12) The Act specifically excludes from its definition of academic facilities “any facility used or to be used for sectarian instruction or as a place of religious worship, or .”
Opinion of the Justices to the Senate, 236 N.E.2d 523 (Mass. 1968). “This interpretation of the bill, if it be the legislative intent, could be clarified to preclude an adverse construction by higher authority.”
Meek v. Pittenger, 374 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Pa. 1974). “Richardson the statute, 20 U.S.C. § 751 (a)(2), explicitly excluded a grant for any facility to be used for sectarian instruction or as a place for religious worship.”
Miller v. Ayres, 191 S.E.2d 261 (Va. 1972). “5 20 U.S.C. § 751 (a) (2) (1964 ed. Supp. V).”
Paducah Junior Coll. v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 255 F. Supp. 147 (W.D. Ky. 1966). “The section of the Act upon which the Commissioner of Education’s denial of the grant was based, 20 U.S.C.A. § 751 (c), provides: The term «development cost”, with respect to an academic facility, means the amount found by the Commissioner j-0 j^g the cost, to the applicant for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.