U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 3— SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, NATIONAL MUSEUMS AND ART GALLERIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER V— JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS

20 U.S.C. § 76n

Repealed. Pub. L. 101–449, § 3, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1050

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–1995 · leading case: Arkansas Writers' Proj., Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 (1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arkansas Writers' Proj., Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 (1987). · cites it 2× “Must this preference be justified by a "compelling governmental need" because a nonprofit organization devoted to some other purpose — dissemination of information about boxing, for example — does not receive the special rate? The Kennedy Center, which is subsidized by the…”
Dong v. Smithsonian Inst., 878 F. Supp. 244 (D.D.C. 1995). “§ 75g); JFK Center for the Performing Arts (20 U.S.C. § 76n(c)); Smithsonian Gallery of Art (20 U.”
— 20 U.S.C. § 76n(a) — 1 case
Arkansas Writers' Proj., Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221 (1987). “Must this preference be justified by a "compelling governmental need" because a nonprofit organization devoted to some other purpose — dissemination of information about boxing, for example — does not receive the special rate? The Kennedy Center, which is subsidized by the…”
— 20 U.S.C. § 76n(c) — 1 case
Dong v. Smithsonian Inst., 878 F. Supp. 244 (D.D.C. 1995). “§ 75g); JFK Center for the Performing Arts (20 U.S.C. § 76n(c)); Smithsonian Gallery of Art (20 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.