20 U.S.C. § 880b
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1972–1998 · leading case: Rios v. Read, 73 F.R.D. 589 (E.D.N.Y 1977).
Rios v. Read, 73 F.R.D. 589 (E.D.N.Y 1977). “5 Although the language of the HEW regulations alone supports this interpretation of the obligation of a school district under Title VI, additional support exists in the legislative history of the 1974 amendments to the Bilingual Education Act, Title VII of the Elementary and…”
Evans v. Buchanan, 416 F. Supp. 328 (D. Del. 1976). “We make no determination on the present adequacy of compliance with the requirements of 20 U.S.C. §§ 880b, et seq. Nor do we here find that the members of the Hispanic population have otherwise been victims of any discriminatory action on the part of *360 any school district…”
Cintron v. Brentwood Union Free Sch. Dist., 455 F. Supp. 57 (E.D.N.Y 1978). “93-380 (Title II) amended the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 by adding thereto the Bilingual Education Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 880b et seq. The Congress under Section 105(a)(1) of the Act, 20 U.”
Judy Serna, a Minor Through Her Parent & Gen. Guardian, Romana Serna v. Portales Mun. Schs., 499 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir. 1974). “” Notwithstanding this knowledge of the plight of Spanish surnamed students in Portales, appellants neither applied for funds under the federal Bilingual Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 880b, nor accepted funds for a similar purpose when they were offered by the State of New Mexico.”
Valeria G. v. Wilson, 12 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (N.D. Cal. 1998). “The Bilingual Educational Act established a program of federal financial assistance intended to encourage local educational authorities to develop and implement bilingual education programs _ We note that although Congress enacted both the Bilingual Education Act and the EEOA as…”
Rios v. Read, 480 F. Supp. 14 (E.D.N.Y 1978). “62-63); and (4) the Bilingual Education Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 880b et seq. is not applicable.”
Serna v. Portales Mun. Schs., 351 F. Supp. 1279 (D.N.M. 1972). “; Title VII, 20 U.S.C. § 880b et seq.). The State of New Mexico’s Bilingual Instruction Act, 11 N.”
Guadalupe Org., Inc. v. Tempe Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 3, 587 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1978). “Beginning with the passage of the Bilingual Education Act in 1968, 20 U.S.C. § 880b, legislators have recognized the desirability of encouraging bilingual education programs.”
Parents' Comm. of Pub. Sch. 19 v. Cmty. Sch. Bd. of Cmty. Sch. Dist. No. 14, 524 F.2d 1138 (2d Cir. 1975). “In December 1974 by a supplemental complaint, 1 adding the United States Commissioner of Education as a defendant, the action was enlarged to charge that a disproportionate amount of the 1974-1975 funds granted pursuant to Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.