U.S. Code » Title 21 » Chapter CHAPTER 27— FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— IMPROVING THE SAFETY OF IMPORTED FOOD

21 U.S.C. § 2241

Inspection by the Secretary of Commerce

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 21 CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In general

The Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, may send 1 or more inspectors to a country or facility of an exporter from which seafood imported into the United States originates. The inspectors shall assess practices and processes used in connection with the farming, cultivation, harvesting, preparation for market, or transportation of such seafood and may provide technical assistance related to such activities.

(2) Inspection report(A) In generalThe Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, shall—(i) prepare an inspection report for each inspection conducted under paragraph (1);(ii) provide the report to the country or exporter that is the subject of the report; and(iii) provide a 30-day period during which the country or exporter may provide a rebuttal or other comments on the findings of the report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.(B) Distribution and use of report

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall consider the inspection reports described in subparagraph (A) in distributing inspection resources under section 350j of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–353, title III, § 306(b), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3959.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Johnson v. Warden, 805 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Warden, 805 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2015). “In this Court, Johnson has filed: (1) a notice of appeal; (2) a “request for COA and appeal from denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 2241 , or alternatively, application for permission to file a second petition for writ of habeas corpus in the…”
Gonzalez-Monterrey v. BICE, No. 02-20860 (5th Cir. May 14, 2003). “PER CURIAM:* Petitioner-Appellant Emilio Gonzalez-Monterrey (“Gonzalez”), immigration detainee number A24787029, appeals the district court’s denial of his 21 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the right of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain him…”
Quintero v. Bureau of Immigr. & Custom Enf't, 71 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2003). “* Petitioner, Jorge Smith Quintero, immigration detainee # 08478-131, appeals the district court’s denial of his 21 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the right of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain him indefinitely in light of the Supreme Court decision…”
Mora-Rueda v. Bureau of Immigr. & Customs Enf't, 81 F. App'x 475 (5th Cir. 2003). “PER CURIAM: * Juan Alberto Mora-Rueda, immigration detainee # 00125-129, appeals the district court’s denial of his 21 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the right of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to detain him indefinitely in light of the Supreme Court…”
Y.J.C. v. Oddo, No. 3:24-cv-00179 (W.D. Pa. July 16, 2025). · cites it 2× “Therefore, Petitioner filed a Petition of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 2241 which initiated was the inception of this case (ECF No.”
United States v. Patrick Falte, No. 17-4630 (4th Cir. May 29, 2018). “PER CURIAM: Patrick Falte pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to aggravated sexual abuse of a minor, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 2241 (c) (2012). The district court imposed a Guidelines sentence of life imprisonment.”
Chambers v. Ciolli, No. 3:20-cv-50009 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 5, 2021). “He filed this petition under 21 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking restoration of his good time credits on January 9, 2020.”
Brown v. Sproul, No. 3:22-cv-02721 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 2023). “In Brown’s initial petition under § 2241, he challenged the denial of his ability to obtain a “nearer release transfer” which is a transfer for the purpose of placing an inmate closer to his family.”
Gan v. Wolf, No. 2:20-cv-00947 (D. Nev. June 25, 2020). “1 I THEREFORE ORDER that Gan’s Petition for A Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 21U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. 3 I FURTHER ORDER the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment accordingly and close this All case.”
(HC) Chen v. Warden, USP Atwater, No. 1:24-cv-00153 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2024). “He is challenging the manner in which his sentence was and is being 17 executed, which renders the judgment void[,] as required by 21 U.S.C. § 2241 .” (Id. at 1.) Petitioner 18 believes the magistrate judge “ignored the claims raised,” asserting: 19 The court erroneous asserts…”
Shedd v. Paul, No. 5:24-cv-00302 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 9, 2025). “Although the deadline for doing so has passed, Shedd did not file a reply in further support of his petition. Thus, the matter is ripe for review.”
Beauchaine, No. 3:25-cv-00058 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2026). “§§ 3632 (d)(4)(D) and (d)(4)(D)(xxxix) due to his conviction for manufacturing child pornography, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 2241 (a) and (e) and directed that objections were due within 14 days such that objections by non-ECF users were due by December 1, 2025, Petitioner’s…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.