21 U.S.C. § 968
Service of subpena; proof of service
A subpena of the Secretary of the Treasury may be served by any person designated in the subpena to serve it. Service upon a natural person may be made by personal delivery of the subpena to him. Service may be made upon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership or other unincorporated association which is subject to suit under a common name, by delivering the subpena to an officer, a managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. The affidavit of the person serving the subpena entered on a true copy thereof by the person serving it shall be proof of service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1992–2017 · leading case: United States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929 (5th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929 (5th Cir. 1994). “Variance The indictment charged two conspiracies lasting from 1987 through the date of the indictment: conspiracy to import marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 , and conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute it in violation of 21 U.”
United States v. Daniel Oriakhi, 57 F.3d 1290 (4th Cir. 1995). “Notwithstanding his flight, in June 1990 Daniel Oriakhi was indicted along with seven others for conspiracy to import heroin into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 . Oriakhi returned to the United States later in the summer of 1990 with a false passport issued in…”
United States v. Restrepo, 547 F. App'x 34 (2d Cir. 2013). “§ 846 , (2) import cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 , and (3) distribute and import cocaine internationally in violation of 21 U.”
United States v. Moreno-Montenegro, 553 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2014). “On August 11, 2011, Moreno-Montenegro pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to import heroin into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 968 , 960(a)(1), 960(b)(1)(A), & 952(a), and one count of conspiracy to distribute heroin intending that it would be unlawfully…”
United States v. Lopez-Imitalo, 305 F. App'x 818 (2d Cir. 2009). “§ 846 , and one count of conspiracy to import heroin into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 , and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 40 years and, thereafter, 5 years of supervised release.”
United States v. Oswaldo Cayasso, 130 F. App'x 371 (11th Cir. 2005). “The jury returned a guilty verdict on all four counts: (1) conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 ; (2) importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.”
United States v. Mario Benitez, 500 F. App'x 660 (9th Cir. 2012). “§ 846 , conspiracy to import controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 , and possession with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.”
Sepulveda v. United States, 69 F. Supp. 2d 633 (D.N.J. 1999). “§§ 952 (a) and 960(a)(1), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 . (Gov.App., Ex. 2.) 2 The offense conduct of petitioner and his co-defendant, as set forth in the record of the criminal case, is not in dispute and may be summarized as follows.”
Reynaldo Sosa-Valdespino v. United States, 963 F.2d 347 (11th Cir. 1992). “FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In April 1987, Sosa was indicted along with seven codefendants for conspiracy to import more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 and for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute it aboard a vessel of the United…”
United States v. Alejandro Sotelo, 707 F. App'x 77 (3rd Cir. 2017). “§§ 846 , 841(b)(1)(A)), Count 2 (conspiracy to import one kilogram or more of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 968 , 960(b)(1)(A)), and Count 44 (conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation' of 18 U.”
United States v. Brens, 376 F. App'x 38 (2d Cir. 2010). “Specifically, Brens appeals from the judgment of the District Court dated February 27, 2008, convicting him of one count of conspiracy to import five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 968 and 960; two counts of conspiracy to distribute and possession…”
United States v. Arnaldo Gonzalez, 648 F. App'x 747 (11th Cir. 2016). “C § 846, attempted importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 968 , and attempted possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.