22 U.S.C. § 1622g
Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; finality of Commission decisions
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish the independence of the Commission in making its determinations on claims in programs that it is authorized to administer pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon the Commission by the War Claims Act of 1948, as amended [50 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.], the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, as amended [22 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.], and Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1954. The decisions of the Commission with respect to claims shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and shall not be subject to review by the Attorney General or any other official of the United States or by any court by mandamus or otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1989–2010 · leading case: Pan Am Flight 73 Liaison Grp. v. Dave, 711 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2010).
Pan Am Flight 73 Liaison Grp. v. Dave, 711 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2010). “” (citing 22 U.S.C. § 1622g)). Although “[t]he decisions of the Commission with respect to claims shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and shall not be subject to review by .”
Edward Haven & Allen Welbel v. Rzeczpospolita Polska, Skarb Panstwa, State Treasury of Poland, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen S.A., 215 F.3d 727 (7th Cir. 2000). “See 22 U.S.C. § 1622g. 9 . The portion of the Treaty Annex cited by Mr.”
Gutwein v. United States, 17 Cl. Ct. 720 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “The decisions of the Commission with respect to claims shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and shall not be subject to review by the Attorney General or any other official of the United States or by any court by mandamus or otherwise.”
Pan Am Flight 73 Liaison Grp. v. Dave (D.D.C. 2010). “" (citing 22 U.S.C. § 1622g)). Although "[t]he decisions of the Commission with respect to claims shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and shall not be subject to review by .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.