22 U.S.C. § 1934
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–329, title II, § 212(b)(1), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 745
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases, 1961–2019 · leading case: United States v. Herminio Lizarraga-Lizarraga, 541 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Herminio Lizarraga-Lizarraga, 541 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1976). “Found in the tractor-trailer that the defendant was driving was ammunition proscribed by the regulations promulgated pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 1934 . The ammunition was found secreted in the door panel of the truck cab, the refrigeration unit in the truck body, and behind the…”
United States v. Paul Norton Van Hee, A/K/A Paul N. Van Hee, Jr., 531 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1976). “In this case one of three persons jointly indicted for conspiring to violate the Munitions Control Act, 22 U.S.C. § 1934 , “and the rules and regulations duly promulgated thereunder .”
United States v. Carl Lutz Wieschenberg & Carl John Heiser, III, 604 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1979). “Count III charged Hardt, Heiser and Wies-chenberg with conspiring to violate 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (c), its successor statute, 22 U.”
United States v. Sterling Blake Davis, Sr., & William McCoy Hill, A/K/A Mike Hill, 583 F.2d 190 (5th Cir. 1978). “(“Davis”) and William Hill were convicted of conspiracy to export a weapon on the Munitions List without an export license or written approval from the State Department, in violation of 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (c) and *192 18 U.S.C. § 371 , the general conspiracy statute.”
United States v. Murray Morris Kessler, Richmond C. Harper, Adler B. Seal, James M. Miller,jr., & Joseph Mazzuka, 530 F.2d 1246 (5th Cir. 1976). “§ 371 (conspiracy to violate 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (a) and (c) by exporting from United States to Mexico arms, ammunition, and implements of war within designated categories of the United States Munitions List, 22 C.”
United States v. Byrne, 422 F. Supp. 147 (E.D. Pa. 1976). “§ 371 and 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (c) 3 and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 22 C.”
Century Arms, Inc. v. Kennedy, 323 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Vt. 1971). “Between July of 1967 and September of 1968, Century applied to the Office of Munitions Control of the State Department for licenses to import the firearms, as required by regulations issued under the Mutual Security Act of 1954 § 414, 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (Supp. V, 1969) amending 22…”
United States v. Manfred Swarovski, 592 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1979). “Thereafter, Swarovski pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of New York to Count One of an indictment charging him with violating 22 U.S.C. § 1934 1 and associated regulations of the State Department.”
United States v. Manfred Swarovski, 557 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1977). “ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: On October 28, 1975, Manfred Swarovski was indicted for attempting to export, without a license from the State Department, a military camera known as the KB25A, designed to be used as a gunsight camera in the F-4 fighter plane, in violation of the…”
Bartone v. United States, 375 U.S. 52 (1963). “848 , as amended, 22 U. S. C. § 1934 . This statute provides a maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment and $25,000 fine.”
United States v. Frank Grady & John Jankowski, 544 F.2d 598 (2d Cir. 1976). “30-caliber semiautomatic rifles in Jankowski’s record or “logbook”; Grady was also convicted of one count of unlawful exportation without a permit of these same rifles, in violation of 22 U.S.C. § 1934 and 22 C.F.R. §§ 121-23 (1975).”
United States v. Eugene You-Tsai Hsu, United States of Am. v. David Tzuwei Yang, 364 F.3d 192 (4th Cir. 2004). “1979) (noting, under predecessor statute, 22 U.S.C. § 1934 (1970), that defendant’s vagueness argument “comes with little grace from one who was fully cognizant of the wrongfulness of his acts”).”
— 22 U.S.C. § 1934(a) — 1 case
United States v. Morton \Mort\" H. Franklin", 598 F.2d 954 (5th Cir. 1979).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.