22 U.S.C. § 212
APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.
“In this title, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1950–2021 · leading case: Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981).
Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981). “22 U. S. C. § 212 ; Kent, supra, at 127 .”
Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 135 S. Ct. 2076 (2015). “22 U. S. C. §§212 , 217a; §617(b), 102 Stat.”
Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958). “386 , 22 U. S. C. § 212 . Second, was the question whether the applicant was participating in illegal conduct, trying to escape the toils of the law, promoting passport frauds, or otherwise engaging in conduct which would violate the laws of the United States.”
Woodward v. Rogers, 344 F. Supp. 974 (D.D.C. 1972). “54 , a predecessor to 22 U.S.C. § 212 , Congress commanded only that “And hereafter passports shall be issued only to citizens of the United States.”
Walter Briehl v. John Foster Dulles, Sec'y of State, 248 F.2d 561 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “11 The Executive Order designated only one general category of passport eligibility, that created by 22 U.S.C.A. § 212 , namely, persons who are citizens of the United States.”
United States v. Claudia Marquez Moreno, 727 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2013). “” 22 U.S.C. § 212 . Such passports specify that “[t]he bearer is a United States national and not a United States citizen.”
Cabebe v. Acheson, Sec'y of State, 183 F.2d 795 (9th Cir. 1950). “” 6 Appellant here does not claim American citizenship, and no one owes American allegiance save either a citizen or a national.”
Brian Hall v. Kathleen Sebelius, 667 F.3d 1293 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “A person born in the United States is, by operation of law, entitled to the benefits of citizenship upon his birth.”
Richard Rynearson v. USA, 601 F. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2015). “22 U.S.C. § 212 . As detailed above, Agent Lands refused to even look at the passports, and Agent Perez did not simply verify the passports’ authenticity—he asked for the identity of Rynearson’s commanding officer and wasted ten to fifteen minutes placing unnecessary phone calls…”
Philip Agee v. Edmund S. Muskie, Sec'y of State, 629 F.2d 80 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “386 , 22 U.S.C. § 212 . Second, was the question whether the applicant was participating in illegal conduct, trying to escape the toils of the law, promoting passport frauds, or otherwise engaging in conduct which would violate the laws of the United States.”
Claude Cartier v. Sec'y of State, 506 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “376 (1907), and thus the State Department determination in issuing a passport is the equivalent of decision that the recipient is a “national of the United States.”
Joaquin Augusto Peignand v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 440 F.2d 757 (1st Cir. 1971). “22 U.S.C. § 212 . Under its terms, to obtain a passport one does not have to be a citizen but merely owe his allegiance to the United States.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.