U.S. Code » Title 22 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS, CONGRESSES, ETC. › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XV— INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND AND BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

22 U.S.C. § 286

Acceptance of membership by United States in International Monetary Fund

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar

The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the “Fund”), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1959–2026 · leading case: McNeil v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 211 (Fed. Cl. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McNeil v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 211 (Fed. Cl. 2007). · cites it 2× “512 , 512 (1945) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 286 ). Both the IMF and the IBRD are overseen by a Board of Governors, which consist of one governor from each member country.”
Mendaro v. World Bank, 717 F.2d 610 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “See 22 U.S.C. § 286 (1976). . Articles of Agreement, supra note 2, at art.”
State v. Casteel, 2001 WI App 188 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “The government be becoming a corporator, [see 22 USC § 286 (e)] lays down its sovereignty and took on *459 that of a private citizen.”
Blanco v. Pan-Am. Life Ins. Co., 221 F. Supp. 219 (S.D. Fla. 1963). · cites it 3× “” The pre-trial stipulation states the issue in terms of whether or not the court is required to recognize and give effect to these Cuban decrees and laws either under our municipal law or under the two Bretton Woods Agreements and 22 U.S.C. § 286 et seq., Acceptance of…”
Pan Am. Life Ins. Co. v. Inocencio Blanco, 311 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1962). · cites it 3× “568 is valid and binding under The Bretton Woods Monetary Agreement of 1945 to which Cuba and the United States are signatories, which was incorporated into the laws of the United States in 22 U.S.C. § 286 ; that the annuity policies in controversy are “exchange contracts” 6…”
Franklin Mint Corp., Franklin Mint Ltd., & McGregor Swire Air Servs. Ltd. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 690 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1982). “512 (1945) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 286 (1976)), it promised to maintain (and, if necessary, redeem) the value of United States dollars in terms of gold.”
Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics, Inc. v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 531 F. Supp. 344 (S.D. Tex. 1981). “512 (1945) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 286 (1976)). For a thorough account of the development of the IMF and the recent international currency crisis, see Heller, The Value of the Gold Franc —A Different Point of View, 6 J.”
Gladys Laycock v. Frank J. Kenney, 270 F.2d 580 (9th Cir. 1959). “” See also Section 5 of the Bretton Woods Agreement Act of 1945 ( 22 U.S.C.A. § 286 ) which provides that neither the President nor any other person or agency shall propose to the International Monetary Fund any change in the par value of the dollar, approve any change in such…”
Int'l Bank for Reconstruction & Dev. v. Dist. of Columbia, 996 F. Supp. 31 (D.D.C. 1998). “1942 (codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. §§ 286 -286mm (1994)) (the “Articles of Agreement”), to recover monies paid to the Defendant District of Columbia to satisfy tax-deficiency assessments levied against Plaintiffs cafeteria operations.”
Int'l Bank for Reconstruction & Dev. v. Dist. of Columbia, 171 F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “The United States accepted the Articles in the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945, 22 U.S.C. §§ 286 -286m. The Bank is empowered to provide financial assistance for the development of member countries, to promote private foreign investment, to stimulate the balanced growth of…”
Theye Y Ajuria v. Pan Am. Life Ins. Co., 154 So. 2d 450 (La. Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 2× “( 22 U.S.C.A. § 286 et seq.). Article VIII, Sec.”
Pan Am. Life Ins. Co. v. Raij, 156 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). “See: 22 U.S.C.A. § 286 et seq. At the time of the original opinion in this cause, this Agreement was considered and deemed to be not applicable, for the reason that the contract involved was a contract with an American company, made in the United States, payable in United States…”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.