22 U.S.C. § 402 to 405
Repealed. Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 434, § 2, 67 Stat. 577
22 U.S.C. § 402 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 22 U.S.C. § 402 to 405, shown below.
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1946–1948 · leading case: United States v. 200 WATCHES, 66 F. Supp. 228 (S.D.N.Y. 1946).
United States v. 200 WATCHES, 66 F. Supp. 228 (S.D.N.Y. 1946). “22 U.S.C.A. § 402 . These petitions were then filed demanding restoration oí the seized property ( 22 U.”
United States v. Three Cadillac Coupes, 157 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1946). “A trial was had, and the court, without passing on the merits, ordered restoration of the vehicles to the claimants on the ground that warrant for further detention of the seized property had not been applied for within ten days after seizure as required by the statute, 22…”
In re 59 Skids of Tin Plate, 81 F. Supp. 750 (D.N.J. 1948). “§ 401 , quoted in the annexed appendix, the shipment was seized, and thereafter, pursuant to the provisions of Section 402 of the said Title, 22 U.S.C.A. § 402 , application was made to this court for a warrant of detention.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.