22 U.S.C. § 4862

Prohibition on use of funds for facilities in Israel, Jerusalem, or West Bank

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for site acquisition, development, or construction of any facility in Israel, Jerusalem, or the West Bank.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Framaco Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 311 (Fed. Cl. 2015).
Framaco Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 311 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “99-399, codified at 22 U.S.C. § 4862 ), the Percy Amendment and similar thresholds involving past performance considerations.”
Caddell Constr. Co. v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 383 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “The Notice of Solicitation required prospective offerors to demonstrate that they qualified as “United States Persons” under the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Anti-terrorism Act of 1986, 22 U.S.C. § 4862 (2012) (“Security Act”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.