23 U.S.C. § 140

Nondiscrimination

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 23 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Prior to approving any programs for projects as provided for in section 135, the Secretary shall require assurances from any State desiring to avail itself of the benefits of this chapter that employment in connection with proposed projects will be provided without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, or sex. The Secretary shall require that each State shall include in the advertised specifications, notification of the specific equal employment opportunity responsibilities of the successful bidder. In approving programs for projects on any of the Federal-aid systems, the Secretary, if necessary to ensure equal employment opportunity, shall require certification by any State desiring to avail itself of the benefits of this chapter that there are in existence and available on a regional, statewide, or local basis, apprenticeship, skill improvement or other upgrading programs, registered with the Department of Labor or the appropriate State agency, if any, which provide equal opportunity for training and employment without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, or sex. In implementing such programs, a State may reserve training positions for persons who receive welfare assistance from such State; except that the implementation of any such program shall not cause current employees to be displaced or current positions to be supplanted or preclude workers that are participating in an apprenticeship, skill improvement, or other upgrading program registered with the Department of Labor or the appropriate State agency from being referred to, or hired on, projects funded under this title without regard to the length of time of their participation in such program. The Secretary shall periodically obtain from the Secretary of Labor and the respective State transportation departments information which will enable the Secretary to judge compliance with the requirements of this section and the Secretary of Labor shall render to the Secretary such assistance and information as the Secretary of Transportation shall deem necessary to carry out the equal employment opportunity program required hereunder.(b) The Secretary, in cooperation with any other department or agency of the Government, State agency, authority, association, institution, Indian tribal government, corporation (profit or nonprofit), or any other organization or person, is authorized to develop, conduct, and administer surface transportation and technology training, including skill improvement programs, and to develop and fund summer transportation institutes. From administrative funds made available under section 104(a), the Secretary shall deduct such sums as necessary, not to exceed $10,000,000 per fiscal year, for the administration of this subsection. Such sums so deducted shall remain available until expended. The provisions of section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41 shall not be applicable to contracts and agreements made under the authority herein granted to the Secretary. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not to exceed ½ of 1 percent of funds apportioned to a State for the surface transportation block grant program under section 104(b) may be available to carry out this subsection upon request of the State transportation department to the Secretary.(c) The Secretary, in cooperation with any other department or agency of the Government, State agency, authority, association, institution, Indian tribal government, corporation (profit or nonprofit), or any other organization or person, is authorized to develop, conduct, and administer training programs and assistance programs in connection with any program under this title in order that minority businesses may achieve proficiency to compete, on an equal basis, for contracts and subcontracts. From administrative funds made available under section 104(a), the Secretary shall deduct such sums as necessary, not to exceed $10,000,000 per fiscal year, for the administration of this subsection. The provisions of section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41 shall not be applicable to contracts and agreements made under the authority herein granted to the Secretary notwithstanding the provisions of section 3106 of title 41.(d)Indian Employment.—Consistent with section 703(i) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–2(i)), nothing in this section shall preclude the preferential employment of Indians living on or near a reservation on projects and contracts on Indian reservation roads. States may implement a preference for employment of Indians on projects carried out under this title near Indian reservations. The Secretary shall cooperate with Indian tribal governments and the States to implement this subsection.(Added Pub. L. 90–495, § 22(a), Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 826; amended Pub. L. 91–605, title I, § 110, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 93–87, title I, § 120, Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 259; Pub. L. 94–280, title I, § 126, May 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 97–424, title I, § 119, Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2110; Pub. L. 100–17, title I, § 122, Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 160; Pub. L. 102–240, title I, § 1026, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1965; Pub. L. 102–388, title IV, § 412, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1565; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §§ 1208, 1212(a)(2)(A), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 186, 193; Pub. L. 109–59, title I, § 1922, Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1481; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(e)(1), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3847; Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, § 1109, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 444; Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, §§ 1109(c)(5), 1446(d)(1), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1343, 1438; Pub. L. 117–58, div. A, title I, § 11525(i), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 607.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–58 substituted “Secretary, if necessary” for “Secretary if necessary” in third sentence.

2015—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–94, § 1446(d)(1), amended directory language of Pub. L. 112–141, § 1109(a)(2). See 2012 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 114–94, § 1109(c)(5), substituted “surface transportation block grant program” for “surface transportation program”.

2012—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–141, § 1109(a)(1), substituted “From administrative funds made available under section 104(a),” for “Whenever apportionments are made under section 104(b)(3) of this title,”.

Pub. L. 112–141, § 1109(a)(2), as amended by Pub. L. 114–94, § 1446(d)(1), struck out “and the bridge program under section 144” after “section 104(b)”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–141, § 1109(b), substituted “From administrative funds made available under section 104(a),” for “Whenever apportionments are made under section 104(b)(3),”.

2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(e)(1)(A), substituted “section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41” for “section 3709 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (41 U.S.C. 5),”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(e)(1)(B), substituted “section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41” for “section 3709 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (41 U.S.C. 5),” and “section 3106 of title 41” for “section 302(e) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 252(e))”.

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–59, § 1922(a), in first sentence, substituted “section 135” for “subsection (a) of section 105 of this title”, in second sentence, substituted “The Secretary” for “He”, in third sentence, substituted “if necessary to ensure” for “shall, where he considers it necessary to assure” and inserted “shall” before “require”, and, in last sentence, substituted “the Secretary to” for “him to” and “the Secretary of Transportation” for “he”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–59, § 1922(b), in first sentence, substituted “surface transportation” for “highway construction” and, in second sentence, struck out “he may deem” before “necessary” and “not to exceed $2,500,000 for the transition quarter ending September 30, 1976, and” before “not to exceed $10,000,000”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–59, § 1922(c), substituted “section 104(b)(3)” for “subsection 104(b)(3) of this title” and struck out “he may deem” before “necessary”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–59, § 1922(d), struck out “and Contracting” after “Employment” in heading.

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–178, §§ 1208(a), 1212(a)(2)(A)(ii), inserted “In implementing such programs, a State may reserve training positions for persons who receive welfare assistance from such State; except that the implementation of any such program shall not cause current employees to be displaced or current positions to be supplanted or preclude workers that are participating in an apprenticeship, skill improvement, or other upgrading program registered with the Department of Labor or the appropriate State agency from being referred to, or hired on, projects funded under this title without regard to the length of time of their participation in such program.” after third sentence and substituted “State transportation departments” for “State highway departments”.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–178, §§ 1208(b), 1212(a)(2)(A)(i), inserted “and technology” after “highway construction” and “, and to develop and fund summer transportation institutes” after “skill improvement programs” and substituted “section 104(b)(3)” for “section 104(b)” and “State transportation department” for “State highway department”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–178, § 1208(c), substituted “104(b)(3)” for “104(a)”.

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–388 substituted “½ of 1 percent” for “¼ of 1 percent” in last sentence.

1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–240, § 1026(a), (b), inserted “Indian tribal government,” after “institution,” and inserted at end “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not to exceed ¼ of 1 percent of funds apportioned to a State for the surface transportation program under section 104(b) and the bridge program under section 144 may be available to carry out this subsection upon request of the State highway department to the Secretary.”

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–240, § 1026(b), inserted “Indian tribal government,” after “institution,”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–240, § 1026(c), inserted after first sentence “States may implement a preference for employment of Indians on projects carried out under this title near Indian reservations.”

1987—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–17 added subsec. (d).

1983—Pub. L. 97–424, § 119(c), substituted “Nondiscrimination” for “Equal employment opportunity” in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–424, § 119(a), substituted “, national origin, or sex” for “or national origin” after “color, creed”, in two places.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–424, § 119(b), added subsec. (c).

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–280 substituted second sentence “Whenever apportionments are made under section 104(b) of this title, the Secretary shall deduct such sums as he may deem necessary, not to exceed $2,500,000 for the transition quarter ending September 30, 1976, and not to exceed $10,000,000 per fiscal year, for the administration of this subsection.” for “Whenever an apportionment is made under subsections 104(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(5), and (b)(6) of this title of the sums authorized to be appropriated for expenditure upon the Federal-aid primary and secondary systems, and their extensions within urban areas, the Interstate System, and the Federal-aid urban system for the fiscal years 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1976, the Secretary shall deduct such sums as he may deem necessary not to exceed $5,000,000 per fiscal year for the fiscal years 1972 and 1973, and $10,000,000 per fiscal year for the fiscal years 1974, 1975 and 1976, for administering the provisions of this subsection to be financed from the appropriation for the Federal-aid systems.”

1973—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–87 included apportionment of appropriated moneys for administration of subsec. (b) provisions for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976, and substituted provisions which made available for such administration $5,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years 1972, and 1973, and $10,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years 1974, 1975, and 1976, for prior provision making available $5,000,000 per fiscal year for such administration.

1970—Pub. L. 91–605 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–58 effective Oct. 1, 2021, see section 10003 of Pub. L. 117–58, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Except as otherwise provided, amendment by Pub. L. 114–94 effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, § 1446(d), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1438, provided that the amendment made by section 1446(d)(1) is effective as of July 6, 2012, and as if included in Pub. L. 112–141 as enacted.

Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–240 effective Dec. 18, 1991, and applicable to funds authorized to be appropriated or made available after Sept. 30, 1991, and, with certain exceptions, not applicable to funds appropriated or made available on or before Sept. 30, 1991, see section 1100 of Pub. L. 102–240, set out as a note under section 104 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 23, 1968, see section 37 of Pub. L. 90–495, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1972–2020 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). · cites it 2× “§8303 (c)(2) (Office of Volunteers for Prosperity)  23 U. S. C. §140 (a) (Federal-Aid Highways; Nondiscrimination)  23 U.”
City of Cleveland v. Ohio, 508 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 2007). “In other words, the FHWA contends that in order to be “otherwise lawful,” a contract requirement or obligation must be rooted in federal statute.”
7 Fair empl.prac.cas. 643, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9292 Phyllis Schlafly v. John A. Volpe, Sec'y of Transp., 495 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “Defendants’ apparent purpose in relying upon 23 U.S.C. § 140 is to avoid the attendant conditions imposed by § 2000d-l.”
Dillingham Constr. N.A., Inc. v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 778 F. Supp. 1522 (N.D. Cal. 1991). · cites it 2× “§ 2331 , 2382 and 2471 (State apprenticeship programs and vocational education); 23 U.S.C. § 140 (a) (State apprenticeship programs and federal highways); 38 U.”
Siuslaw Concrete Constr. Co. v. State of Washington, Dep't of Transp. Fed. High. Admin., 784 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1986). “2 23 U.S.C. § 140 and Executive Order 11246 impose a third federal mandate, requiring highway contractors to take affirmative action in hiring, training, and promoting minorities and women, as a condition of federal participation in the project, Exec.”
S. Illinois Builders Ass'n v. Ogilvie, 471 F.2d 680 (7th Cir. 1972). “§ 140 ) requires the State of Illinois to adopt the Ogilvie Plan or one substantially like it with apprenticeship, skill improvement or other upgrading programs without regard to race, color, creed or national origin, in order to participate in Federal-aid highway construction…”
Glasgow, Inc. v. Fed. High. Admin., 843 F.2d 130 (3rd Cir. 1988). “2 We further note that in 23 U.S.C. § 140 , Congress has evidenced its concern for the interests of disadvantaged contractors by requiring the Secretary of Transportation to ensure that bidding on government highway projects is non-discriminatory in nature.”
United States v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Local 169, 457 F.2d 210 (7th Cir. 1972). · cites it 2× “11246 and Section 22(a) of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1968, 23 U.S.C. § 140 , which require equal employment opportunities by contractors and subcontractors on federal and federally assisted construction projects.”
City of Cleveland v. State of OH (6th Cir. 2007). “In other words, the FHWA contends that in order to be “otherwise lawful,” a contract requirement or obligation must be rooted in federal statute.”
Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Fed.-Aid High. Prog. (OLC 2013). “at 826 (codified at 23 U.S.C. § 140 (a) (2006)). 14 Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Federal-Aid Highway Program distinction between the “method” or “process” of competitive bidding, on the one hand, and substantive “requirements or obligations” imposed on contractors,…”
Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Fed.-Aid High. Prog. (OLC 2013). “at 826 (codified at 23 U.S.C. § 140 (a) (2006)). 50 Competitive Bidding Requirements Under the Federal-Aid Highway Program opinion requested by a member of Congress, was added to the statute to address a specific problem.”
Cone Corp. v. Florida Dep't of Transp., 744 F. Supp. 269 (M.D. Fla. 1990). “Further, it is alleged that: 1) Defendants did not at the time of the promulgation of the rules, regulations, and bid conditions and specifications, nor do they now, have the necessary factual basis for determining that such are necessary to remedy identified discrimination; 2)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.