24 U.S.C. § 44
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title III, § 347(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1422
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1961–2004 · leading case: In Re Est. of Couse, 850 A.2d 304 (D.C. 2004).
In Re Est. of Couse, 850 A.2d 304 (D.C. 2004). “That provision is not at issue here, because all agree that the balance of the estate must be disbursed through escheat to the Home.”
Dist. of Columbia v. David R. Wolverton, Adm'r of the Est. of Albert J. Smith, Deceased, 298 F.2d 684 (D.C. Cir. 1961). “The central question before us is whether the provision in 24 U.S.C.A. § 44 for the appropriation of all moneys belonging to the estates of “deceased soldiers” was intended by Congress to include the moneys of an inmate of the Soldiers’ Home, retired from the Army, who dies…”
United States v. Walker, 9 M.J. 892 (1980). “24 U.S.C. § 44 . . While we could have apportioned the affirmed forfeitures over a period of up to three months, we were neither requested nor required to do so.”
United States v. Robertson, 27 M.J. 741 (1988). “1003 with 24 U.S. C. § 44 (fines adjudged by sentence of courts-martial “over and above any amount that may be due for the reimbursement of Government, or of individuals” are set apart and appropriated for the support of the Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.