25 U.S.C. § 1294
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1975–2002 · leading case: Delaware Tribal Bus. Comm. v. Weeks, 430 U.S. 73 (1977).
Delaware Tribal Bus. Comm. v. Weeks, 430 U.S. 73 (1977). “[13] *80 The statute limited distribution to the Cherokee and Absentee Delawares, with amounts payable determined under a formula provided in 25 U. S. C. § 1294 . Ten percent of the *81 total sum was to be set aside for the two tribal bodies, and was to be retained by the United…”
LeBeau v. United States, 171 F. Supp. 2d 1009 (D.S.D. 2001). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1294 . Despite the appropriation of funds to be distributed to individual Indians, the Supreme Court found that “Public Law 92-456 distributes tribal rather than individually owned property, for the funds were appropriated to pay an award redressing the breach of…”
Weeks v. United States, 406 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Okla. 1975). “25 U.S.C.A. § 1294 (a), (b). This portion of the statute is affected by our decision only because of our conclusion that the distribution statute, which has no separability clause, must be held invalid as a whole.”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton, 241 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (N.D. Okla. 2002). “25 U.S.C. § 1294 (b); AR vol. II, at 0059-60 (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.