25 U.S.C. § 1403
Preparation of plan
1983—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 97–458, § 2(a), inserted proviso.
Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 97–458, § 2(b), inserted proviso.
Pub. L. 97–458, § 2(a),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Wolfchild v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 54 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
Wolfchild v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 54 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “Those words were struck from the bill, and 25 U.S.C. § 1403 (a)(2) instead requires the Secretary to hold a public hearing “to obtain the testimony of leaders and members of the Indian tribe which may receive any portion, or be affected by the use of distribution, of such funds.”
Gold v. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation, 478 F. Supp. 190 (D. Or. 1979). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1403 (a). A regulation requires the Secretary to determine who shall share in a judgment.”
United States v. Mary Dann & Carrie Dann, 706 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1983). “We conclude that “payment” has not occurred within the meaning of section 70u(a) until Congress has taken its final look at the award and has either permitted a plan of distribution to become effective pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1403 or has legislated one. One reason for so…”
Sheldon Peters Wolfchild v. United States 03-2684l &, 108 Fed. Cl. 578 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “§ 1402, the Secretary [of the Interior] shall complete preparation of [a] roll and [distribution] plan satisfying the criteria specified in 25 U.S.C. § 1403 within one year from the date of this decision and judgment.”
Rogers v. United States, 877 F.2d 1550 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “The appellants argue that the Secretary did not comply with his obligation under 25 U.S.C. § 1403 and 25 C.F. R. § 41.7 to consult with tribal leaders with regard to all aspects of a distribution plan.”
Evans v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 442 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “§ 1402 (a), 7 taking into account the needs and desires of relevant Indian tribes, see 25 U.S.C. § 1403 (b), and to *457 hold any remaining funds in trust, see 25 U.”
United States v. Overlie, 730 F.2d 1159 (8th Cir. 1984). “25 U.S.C. § 1403 . See 47 Fed.Reg. 30297 (1982).”
Cavazos v. Bernhardt (D.D.C. 2022). “The 1973 Indian Judgment Funds Distribution Act, codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1403 , provided non-reservation Tribal descendants an opportunity to lobby the federal government for assistance in Tribal recognition and membership.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.