25 U.S.C. § 1451
Congressional declaration of policy
It is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to provide capital on a reimbursable basis to help develop and utilize Indian resources, both physical and human, to a point where the Indians will fully exercise responsibility for the utilization and management of their own resources and where they will enjoy a standard of living from their own productive efforts comparable to that enjoyed by non-Indians in neighboring communities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases, 1976–2015 · leading case: Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980).
Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq., and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 88 Stat.”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980). “to help develop and utilize Indian resources, both physical and human, to a point where the Indians will fully exercise responsibility for the utilization and management of their own resources and where they will enjoy a standard of living from their own productive efforts…”
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla., 498 U.S. 505 (1991). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq., and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 88 Stat.”
New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324 (1983). “In addition, the Tribe obtained a $6 million loan from the Bank of New Mexico, 90% of which was guaranteed by the Secretary of the Interior under the Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Mfg. Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq. ). In considering Congress' role in reforming tribal immunity, we find instructive the problems of sovereign immunity for foreign countries.”
Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico, 490 U.S. 163 (1989). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq., or the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 88 Stat.”
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq., and most notably in the Self-Determination Act.”
N. Border Pipeline Co. v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 772 P.2d 829 (Mont. 1989). “The first of these is comprised of statutes enunciating the Federal Government's goal of promoting tribal self-sufficiency and economic development, specifically, the Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.; the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance…”
Bryan v. Itasca Cnty., 426 U.S. 373 (1976). “77 , 25 U. S. C. § 1451 et seq. (1970 ed., Supp.”
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior Court, 148 P.3d 1126 (Cal. 2006). “77 , 25 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq., and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 88 Stat.”
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe v. Rodriguez, 660 F.3d 1177 (10th Cir. 2011). “77 , 25 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq., or the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 88 Stat.”
Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. Kings Cnty., 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1976). “See Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq.; Hastings L.J., at 1472-1473; Goldberg, at 549-551; Comment, State Jurisdiction Over Indian Land Use: An Interpretation of the “Encumbrance” Savings Clause of Public Law 280, 9 Land and Water L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.