25 U.S.C. § 155
Disposal of miscellaneous revenues from Indian reservations, etc.
All miscellaneous revenues derived from Indian reservations, agencies, and schools, except those of the Five Civilized Tribes and not the result of the labor of any member of such tribe, which are not required by existing law to be otherwise disposed of, shall be covered into the Treasury of the United States under the caption “Indian moneys, proceeds of labor”, and are made available for expenditure, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, for the benefit of the Indian tribes, agencies, and schools on whose behalf they are collected, subject, however, to the limitations as to tribal funds, imposed by sections 123 and 142 1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1957–2010 · leading case: Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “The Tribes further argued that the general statutes governing Indian trust fund management, 25 U.S.C. §§ 155 ,161a, 161b, and 162a, mandate the payment of interest.”
Am. Indians Residing on the Maricopa-Ak Chin Reservation v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 167 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “…date no regulation permitted such deposits and the statute required lease payments to be deposited in IMPL accounts. 25 U.S.C.§ 155 (1976).”
Wolfchild v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 302 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “560 (now codified as 25 U.S.C. § 155 ). The 1926 Act also authorized the Secretary to expend the funds "for the benefit of the Indian tribes, agencies, and schools on whose behalf they are collected.”
Te-Moak Bands of W. Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 74 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “582 , 590 ( 25 U.S.C. § 155 ) [and other Acts of Congress]____ At all times referred to herein, defendant has been under a duty to pay interest on funds of said bands____ At all times referred to herein, defendant has been under a duty as guardian and trustee of said bands .”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 446 (Ct. Cl. 1992). “The Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. § 155 , provides: All miscellaneous revenues from Indian reservations .”
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians of Oklahoma v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 340 (Ct. Cl. 1975). “* * *” 25 U.S.C. § 155 (1970). Since 1930, money held In the Treasury In proceeds of labor accounts has earned four percent simple Interest.”
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States, 9 Cl. Ct. 227 (Ct. Cl. 1985). “The placement of these funds into a trust account for the benefit of plaintiff was required by Section 12 of the 1938 regulations and by 25 U.S.C. § 155 (1982), as amended. Plaintiff then points out that 25 U.”
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. Barlow, 834 F.2d 1393 (8th Cir. 1987). “The funds in the “sawmill account” must be transferred to the general account, 6 with the Secretary to have discre *1400 tion to use the funds in accordance with 25 U.S.C. § 155 . 7 This result would be necessary because the federal government’s trust obligations created by the…”
Te-Moak Bands of W. Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 82 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “The second trust fund, known as “Indian Moneys, Proceeds of Labor,” was derived from the Act of March 3, 1883 (now codified at 25 U.S.C. § 155 (1982)). The GSA report contained the dates on which the funds were awarded and detailed how those funds were invested and disbursed.”
Martinez v. S. Ute Tribe of S. Ute Reservation, 249 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1957). “582 , 25 U.S.C.A. § 155 . . Act of July 13, 1892, c.”
Te-Moak Bands of W. Shoshone Indians v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 435 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “25 U.S.C. § 155 (1988). This problem is exacerbated by the common usage of the terms “benefit” and “relates to the tribal interest” in the cases relied on by both sides.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.