Notes of Decisions
Cited in
21
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case:
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021).
Brackeen v. Haaland, 994 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2021).
“§ 1602 (explaining that the legislation was passed “in fulfillment of [the Government’s] special trust responsibilities and legal obligations to Indians”); Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450a(a) (“The Congress hereby recognizes the obligation…”
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. United States, 9 F.4th 1018 (8th Cir. 2021).
“” 25 U.S.C. § 1602 . The Snyder Act thus marked the beginning of Congressional funding for healthcare to all federally- recognized tribes, and the IHCIA established the structure to deliver healthcare services throughout Indian country.”
Rancheria v. Hargan, 296 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
“25 U.S.C. § 1602 (7). This provision is notable for two reasons.”
White v. Califano, 437 F. Supp. 543 (D.S.D. 1977).
“94-437 ( 25 U.S.C. § 1602 ) Congress declared: The Congress hereby declares that it is the policy of this Nation, in fulfillment of its special responsibilities and legal obligations to the American Indian people, to meet the national goal of providing the highest possible…”
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 349 (Fed. Cl. 1995).
“25 U.S.C. § 1602 (1988). . The Indian Health Services Act transferred responsibility for all hospitals and health care facilities under the control of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to the IHS.”
Williams v. United States, 242 F.3d 169 (4th Cir. 2001).
“” 25 U.S.C. § 1602 (a). In particular, having found that “the unmet health needs of the American Indian people are severe and the health status of the Indians is far below that of the general population of the United States,” id.”
Preston v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 1359 (9th Cir. 1984).
“1401 (1976) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1602 (1982)). If, after giving full weight to the unique experience and background of Indians, as required by statute, the Secretary concludes that the only proper qualifications for a particular position are those that have already been…”
Blue Legs v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, 867 F.2d 1094 (8th Cir. 1989).
“" 25 U.S.C. § 1602 . We think the IHCIA at a minimum obligates the IHS to refrain from contributing to poor health conditions on the Reservation through indifference to the disposal of the solid waste IHS produces.”
Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corp. v. Trust Ins. Plan, 884 F. Supp. 1360 (D. Alaska 1994).
“See 25 U.S.C. § 1602 (a). Congress enacted § 1621e as part of an effort to improve health care for Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and specifically to preserve scarce financial resources for their health care by precluding insurers from collecting premiums only to deny…”
McNabb for McNabb v. Heckler, 628 F. Supp. 544 (D. Mont. 1986).
“25 U.S.C. § 1602 . After finding that the above-quoted language “is the latest statement of Congress on the trust responsibility of the federal government in relation to Indian tribes in the area of health services,” the court found a duty to act on the part of the federal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.