25 U.S.C. § 162
Repealed. June 24, 1938, ch. 648, § 2, 52 Stat. 1037
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1932–2026 · leading case: In re United States, 590 F.3d 1305 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
In re United States, 590 F.3d 1305 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “…(2005)). We think that the statutes that the trial court cites amply demonstrate that relationship. See id.; see also 25 U.S.C. § 162 (a) (2006) (trust investment); § 450j (contract administration); § 458cc (funding agreements); § 3120 (forest resources); § 3303 (education); §…”
Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 639 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “Yet the importance of seeking higher market-based yields prompted further legislation (the 1918 enactment of 25 U.S.C. § 162 ) that allowed for the investment of Indian trust funds outside of the Treasury in banks that offered adequate security, and even further legislation (the…”
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R., 84 P.3d 418 (Alaska 2004). “25 U.S.C. § 162 If (2001) provides; (a) .”
Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 629 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “Yet the importance of seeking higher market-based yields prompted further legislation (the 1918 enactment of 25 U.S.C. § 162 ) that allowed for the investment of Indian trust funds outside of the Treasury in banks that offered adequate security, and even further legislation (the…”
Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill., 64 F.2d 721 (7th Cir. 1933). “365 , 12 USCA § 701; as to postal service funds, 39 Stat.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation, Formerly Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 274 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “Prior to 1880, Congress had also provided for the placement of trust funds in investments other than interest-bearing Treasury accounts that allowed the funds to attract more favorable market rates, but the risks involved led to the enactment of 25 U.”
Mary Martinez v. S. Ute Tribe, a Corp., 273 F.2d 731 (10th Cir. 1960). “Section 163 is a general statute authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to cause a final roll to be made of the membership of any Indian tribe, which roll, when approved, shall constitute a legal membership of the respective tribes for the purpose of segregating the tribal…”
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Smith, 56 F.2d 799 (3rd Cir. 1932). “291 , § 8 [31 USCA § 771]) with regard to the deposit of moneys received from the sale of United States bonds, and one in 1918 (25 USCA § 162) providing for the deposit of certain Indian *802 funds in banks to be designated by the Secretary of the Interior permit the deposit…”
W. Shoshone Identifiable Grp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). “§ 162 (a) The parties have stipulated that “Tribal Trust Funds” are tribal monies, including judgment awards, revenues, and other payments made to Indian tribes, which are required by law to be deposited in the United States Treasury and historically to be managed by the United…”
Cherokee Nation v. Bureau of Indian Affairs (D.D.C. 2021). “1999) (Cobell V) (“Plaintiffs’ statutorily-based claims against the government,” including those under 25 U.S.C. § 162 (d), “can be brought under the APA”) (citing Rockbridge v.”
POPE v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2026). “In Mitchell, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government owed a specific trust duty to the tribe because the government agency supervised and controlled the day-to-day process of harvesting tribal timber and the statute at issue, 25 U.S.C. § 162 (a), authorized the…”
Inv. of Fed. Trust Funds for Cheyenne River & Lower Brule Sioux (OLC 2001). “1973), a federal district court opinion concluding that the TVA trust fund eligibility language, as well as the language in several other GSE charter statutes, rendered TVA obligations eligible for Indian trust fund investments, notwithstanding language in the particular Indian…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.