25 U.S.C. § 1706
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2015 · leading case: Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994).
Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994). “§ 1715 (a), and its exemption from state regulations anent fishing and hunting, 25 U.S.C. § 1706 (a)(3). . This legal principle also disposes of certain other arguments raised by the Tribe.”
Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Narragansett Elec. Co., 878 F. Supp. 349 (D.R.I. 1995). “The Settlement Act authorizes the Tribe “to establish its own regulations concerning hunting and fishing on the settlement lands,” 25 U.S.C. § 1706 (a)(3), and exempts the settlement lands, but not income producing activities occurring on them, from “any form of Federal, State,…”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 144 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2015). “25 U.S.C. § 1706 (a)(3). The Massachusetts Settlement Act also contains exceptions related to hunting by means other than firearms or crossbow (but not fishing) and taxation.”
Narragansett Indian v. State of Rhode Islan, 449 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2005). “The statutory scheme does exempt the settlement lands from state hunting and fishing regulations, see 25 U.S.C. § 1706 (a)(3), but that exemption is of no consequence here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.