25 U.S.C. § 1724
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2021 · leading case: Kimball v. Land Use Reg. Comm'n, 2000 ME 20 (Me. 2000).
Kimball v. Land Use Reg. Comm'n, 2000 ME 20 (Me. 2000). “See 25 U.S.C.A. § 1724 (1983). 3 As a result of the settlement, the Legislature passed An Act to Implement the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (Implementing Act), which in part set up a statutory scheme under which certain parcels of land would be *389 designated “Indian…”
Gila River Indian Cmty. v. United States, 729 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2013). “, 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (i)(2) (allowing Indian tribe to use government-provided funds to purchase “acreage within .”
Dark-Eyes v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 887 A.2d 848 (Conn. 2006). “that are to be acquired by the Secretary from certain private landowners” [emphasis added]) 32 and 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (a), (c) and (d) (under Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980, allocating $27 million as “claims settlement fund” and $54 million as “land acquisition fund”;…”
Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine, 112 F.3d 538 (1st Cir. 1997). “18 See 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (d)(3); 25 U.S.C. 1722(j); Me.”
Carcieri v. Norton, 398 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2005). “Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (e) (“Except for the provisions of this subchapter, the United States shall have no other authority to acquire lands or natural resources in trust for the benefit of Indians .”
Gila River Indian Cmty. v. United States, 697 F.3d 886 (9th Cir. 2012). “, 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (i)(2) (allowing Indian tribe to use government-provided funds to purchase “acreage within .”
Akins v. Penobscot Indian, 130 F.3d 482 (1st Cir. 1997). “Secondly, the subject matter appears to be one which the settlement statutes viewed as being within legitimate tribal concern; both the Implementing Act, § 6203, and the Settlement Act, § 1722, define “land and other natural resources” as meaning, inter alia, “timber and timber…”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne, 497 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2005). “25 U.S.C. § 1724 (e) (“Except for the provisions of this [Act], the United States shall have no other authority to acquire lands or natural resources in trust for the benefit of Indians or Indian nations, or tribes, or bands of Indians in the State of Maine.”
Penobscot Nation v. Stilphen, 461 A.2d 478 (Me. 1983). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (a)-(d). 7 . The Penobscot Nation’s counsel acknowledged that the expansion of the State’s jurisdiction over the Maine Indian tribes from what he conceived it previously to be was part of the quid pro quo for the State’s going along with the settlement,…”
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Ryan, 484 F.3d 41 (1st Cir. 2007). “Compare 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (e) (placing restrictions on the authority of the United States to take land into trust on behalf of Maine tribes), with id.”
Carcieri v. Norton, 290 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.R.I. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 1724 (e) (“Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act”) (“Except for the provisions of this sub-chapter, the United States shall have no other authority to acquire lands or natural resources in trust for the benefit of Indians or Indian nations, or tribes, or bands of…”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 935 F. Supp. 2d 195 (D.D.C. 2013). “1785 , 1791 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1724 (e)) (“Except for the provisions of this subchapter, the United States shall have no other authority to acquire lands or natural resources in trust for the benefit of Indians or Indian nations, or tribes, or bands of Indians in the State…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.