25 U.S.C. § 1752
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2006 · leading case: Dark-Eyes v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 887 A.2d 848 (Conn. 2006).
Dark-Eyes v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 887 A.2d 848 (Conn. 2006). “” 16 25 U.S.C. § 1752 (7). “Settlement lands” are, in turn, *577 defined to include approximately twenty acres of land contributed by the state as well as “private settlement lands.”
State of Conn. Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. Babbitt, 26 F. Supp. 2d 397 (D. Conn. 1998). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1752 (7). The Act acknowledged the conveyance by the State to the Tribe of a twenty acre tract, and designated this tract part of the settlement lands, making it eligible for inclusion in the new federal reservation.”
Carcieri v. Norton, 290 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.R.I. 2003). “” 25 U.S.C. §§ 1752 (3), (4). Lands contained within that geographical area that were purchased with settlement funds were to be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the tribe.”
Connecticut ex rel. Blumenthal v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 228 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2000). “25 U.S.C. §§ 1752 (3) & (4). The Act also defines “reservation” to mean “the existing reservation of the Tribe .”
State v. Spears, 647 A.2d 1054 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994). “25 U.S.C. §§ 1752 and 1754. Reservation land is held in trust for the tribe by the federal government.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.