25 U.S.C. § 1771e
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994).
Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(a); 25 U.S.C. § 1725 (f).”
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 853 F.3d 618 (1st Cir. 2017). “25 U.S.C. § 1771e(a) (stating that the Tribe “shall not have any jurisdiction over nontribal members and shall not exercise any juris *625 diction over any part of the [Settlement [L]ands in contravention of [the Federal Act], the civil regulatory and criminal laws of [the…”
Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah, 833 N.E.2d 157 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005). “, and given the explicit right to transfer easements, 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(c)(3)(B), in accordance with the Commonwealth’s laws and subject to the Commonwealth’s jurisdiction, it would be anomalous indeed were we to conclude that the Tribe could not be joined in a suit to resolve…”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 144 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2015). “Although the Massachusetts Settlement Act contains language limiting- the Tribe’s jurisdiction to some degree, see 25 U.S.C. § 1771e (providing that the Tribe “shall not have any jurisdiction over nontribal members” and mandating that its jurisdiction shall not contravene “the…”
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 63 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D. Mass. 1999). “25U.S.C. § 1771e(a). Section 1771g of the Massachusetts Settlement Act provides: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this subchapter, or in the State Implementing Act, the settlement lands and any other land that may now or hereafter be owned by or held in trust for any…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(a) — 4 cases
Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(a); 25 U.S.C. § 1725 (f).”
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 853 F.3d 618 (1st Cir. 2017). “25 U.S.C. § 1771e(a) (stating that the Tribe “shall not have any jurisdiction over nontribal members and shall not exercise any juris *625 diction over any part of the [Settlement [L]ands in contravention of [the Federal Act], the civil regulatory and criminal laws of [the…”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 144 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2015). “Although the Massachusetts Settlement Act contains language limiting- the Tribe’s jurisdiction to some degree, see 25 U.S.C. § 1771e (providing that the Tribe “shall not have any jurisdiction over nontribal members” and mandating that its jurisdiction shall not contravene “the…”
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 63 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D. Mass. 1999). “25U.S.C. § 1771e(a). Section 1771g of the Massachusetts Settlement Act provides: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this subchapter, or in the State Implementing Act, the settlement lands and any other land that may now or hereafter be owned by or held in trust for any…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(c)(3)(B) — 1 case
Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah, 833 N.E.2d 157 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005). “, and given the explicit right to transfer easements, 25 U.S.C. § 1771e(c)(3)(B), in accordance with the Commonwealth’s laws and subject to the Commonwealth’s jurisdiction, it would be anomalous indeed were we to conclude that the Tribe could not be joined in a suit to resolve…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.