25 U.S.C. § 1771g
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 853 F.3d 618 (1st Cir. 2017).
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 853 F.3d 618 (1st Cir. 2017). “The Federal Act provides, inter alia, that the Settlement Lands “shall be subject to the civil and criminal laws, ordinances, and jurisdiction of the Commonwealth .”
Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe, 19 F.3d 685 (1st Cir. 1994). “See 25 U.S.C. § 1771g (1988); 25 U.S.C. § 1725 (1988).”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 144 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2015). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. The Bureau of Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior then took the Settlement Lands into trust.”
Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah, 833 N.E.2d 157 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005). “277, § 5; 25 U.S.C. § 1771g (2000). In light of Shellfish Hatchery Corp.”
Bldg. Inspector & Zoning Officer v. Wampanoag Aquinnah Shellfish Hatchery Corp., 443 Mass. 1 (Mass. 2004). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. The town conveyed certain property subject to the settlement agreement, including the Cook Lands, to the United States of America to be held “in trust for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), formerly known as The Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head,…”
Wiener v. Wampanoag Aquinnah Shellfish Hatchery Corp., 223 F. Supp. 2d 346 (D. Mass. 2002). “25 U.S.C. § 1771g. Because the federal act at issue here directs consideration of state and local law, not federal law, to resolve the dispute between the parties, the federal issue involved cannot be said to be sufficiently substantial or necessary to invoke Smith.”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 98 F. Supp. 3d 55 (D. Mass. 2015). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. In 1988, Congress enacted the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.”
Commonwealth v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), 390 F. Supp. 3d 183 (D.D.C. 2019). “" 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. 3 B. Proceedings in the District Court On December 2, 2013, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a complaint with the Single Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County against the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), the Wampanoag Tribal…”
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 63 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D. Mass. 1999). “setts Settlement Act provides: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this subchapter, or in the State Implementing Act, the settlement lands and any other land that may now or hereafter be owned by or held in trust for any Indian tribe or entity in the town of Gay Head,…”
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, 36 F. Supp. 3d 229 (D. Mass. 2014). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. In 1988, Congress enacted the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.”
Commw. of Mass. v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (1st Cir. 2021). “" 25 U.S.C. § 1771g. Soon after the passage of the Settlement Act, Congress enacted IGRA which "creates a framework for regulating gaming -5- activity on Indian lands" that distinguishes between different types of gaming.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.