U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 19— INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENTS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XIII— CHEROKEE, CHOCTAW, AND CHICKASAW NATIONS CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

25 U.S.C. § 1779e

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2005–2007 · leading case: The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 148 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 148 (Fed. Cl. 2005). · cites it 6× “The Cherokee Nation argues that the Settlement Act is not money-mandating because it does not authorize payment out of the general judgment fund, but rather from a fund set aside for the Cherokee Nation’s payment of attorney’s fees.”
United Keetoowah Band v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 303 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “25 U.S.C. § 1779e(c), (d). Fifty percent of the compensation was deposited in a tribal trust account for the Cherokee Nation.”
Cherokee Nation v. United States, 73 Fed. Cl. 467 (Fed. Cl. 2006). · cites it 3× “Cherokee Nations’ Arguments The Cherokee Nation makes several arguments urging the Court to revisit its determination that it has jurisdiction to hear PB’s claim for money damages pursuant to the Settlement Act.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1779e(a) — 2 cases
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 148 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “The Cherokee Nation argues that the Settlement Act is not money-mandating because it does not authorize payment out of the general judgment fund, but rather from a fund set aside for the Cherokee Nation’s payment of attorney’s fees.”
Cherokee Nation v. United States, 73 Fed. Cl. 467 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “Cherokee Nations’ Arguments The Cherokee Nation makes several arguments urging the Court to revisit its determination that it has jurisdiction to hear PB’s claim for money damages pursuant to the Settlement Act.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1779e(b) — 2 cases
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 148 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “The Cherokee Nation argues that the Settlement Act is not money-mandating because it does not authorize payment out of the general judgment fund, but rather from a fund set aside for the Cherokee Nation’s payment of attorney’s fees.”
Cherokee Nation v. United States, 73 Fed. Cl. 467 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “Cherokee Nations’ Arguments The Cherokee Nation makes several arguments urging the Court to revisit its determination that it has jurisdiction to hear PB’s claim for money damages pursuant to the Settlement Act.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1779e(c) — 1 case
United Keetoowah Band v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 303 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “25 U.S.C. § 1779e(c), (d). Fifty percent of the compensation was deposited in a tribal trust account for the Cherokee Nation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.