25 U.S.C. § 263
Prohibition of trade by President
The President is authorized, whenever in his opinion the public interest may require the same, to prohibit the introduction of goods, or of any particular article, into the country belonging to any Indian tribe, and to direct all licenses to trade with such tribe to be revoked, and all applications therefor to be rejected. No trader to any other tribe shall, so long as such prohibition may continue, trade with any Indians of or for the tribe against which such prohibition is issued.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1965–1993 · leading case: Cent. Mach. Co. v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n, 448 U.S. 160 (1980).
Cent. Mach. Co. v. Arizona State Tax Comm'n, 448 U.S. 160 (1980). “25 U. S. C. § 263 . Penalties are provided for unlicensed trading, introduction of goods, or residence on a reservation for the purpose of trade.”
Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, 380 U.S. 685 (1965). “729 , now 25 U. S. C. § 263 (1958 ed.) (empowering the President in the public interest to forbid introduction of any or all goods into the territory of a tribe, and to revoke and refuse all licenses to trade with that tribe); 4 Stat.”
Laguna Indus., Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 845 P.2d 167 (N.M. Ct. App. 1992). “§ 264 provides that one "who shall attempt to reside in the Indian country, or on any Indian reservation, as a trader, or to introduce goods, or to trade therein, without such license, shall forfeit all merchandise offered for sale to the Indians or found in his possession.”
New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't v. Laguna Indus., Inc., 855 P.2d 127 (N.M. 1993). “Under the Department’s interpretation, both licensed traders and unlicensed individuals would be free to sell “services” to the tribe during the embargo, presumably including gunsmith services.”
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. O'cheskey, 625 F.2d 967 (10th Cir. 1980). “The majority quoted from 25 U.S.C. § 263 ,' “introduction of goods” into the country belonging to any Indian Tribe; § 264, making it an offense to introduce goods or to trade on a reservation without a license; and 25 C.”
Nm Tax. & Rev. Dept. v. Laguna Ind., 855 P.2d 127 (N.M. 1993). “Under the Department's interpretation, both licensed traders and unlicensed individuals would be free to sell "services" to the tribe during the embargo, presumably including gunsmith services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.