U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 29— INDIAN GAMING REGULATION

25 U.S.C. § 2705

Powers of Chairman

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Chairman, on behalf of the Commission, shall have power, subject to an appeal to the Commission, to—(1) issue orders of temporary closure of gaming activities as provided in section 2713(b) of this title;(2) levy and collect civil fines as provided in section 2713(a) of this title;(3) approve tribal ordinances or resolutions regulating class II gaming and class III gaming as provided in section 2710 of this title; and(4) approve management contracts for class II gaming and class III gaming as provided in sections 2710(d)(9) and 2711 of this title.(b) The Chairman shall have such other powers as may be delegated by the Commission.(Pub. L. 100–497, § 6, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2470.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney, 867 P.2d 1034 (Kan. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney, 867 P.2d 1034 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 2710 (a)(2); 25 U.S.C. § 2705 (1988); 25 U.S.C. § 2706 (1988).”
Catskill Dev., L.L.C. v. Park Place Ent. Corp., 154 F. Supp. 2d 696 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 2705 (a)(4), 2710(d)(9), 2711.”
United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe, 135 F.3d 558 (8th Cir. 1998). · cites it 2× “6 (11) (1996), informing the Tribe that, in the absence of a tribal-state compact, its class III gaming activities were being conducted in violation of the IGRA, and demanding that the Tribe close its gaming facility on or before May 3, 1996.”
United States v. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, 321 F.3d 939 (10th Cir. 2002). “” 25 U.S.C. § 2705 (a)(1) (emphasis added).”
State of Kansas v. Nat'l Indian Gaming, 861 F.3d 1024 (10th Cir. 2017). “§ 2706 (granting specific powers to the Commission), and 25 U.S.C. § 2705 (b) (granting to the Chairman “such other powers as may be delegated by the Commission”).”
Sas & Fox Tribe of Mississippi in Iowa v. United States, 264 F. Supp. 2d 830 (N.D. Iowa 2003). · cites it 3× “25 U.S.C. §§ 2705 , 2706. Thus, the IGRA defines the types of gaming allowed on Indian lands and charges the NIGC with the regulation of such gaming to ensure compliance with the terms of the statute.”
Catskill Dev., L.L.C. v. Park Place Ent. Corp., 144 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “25 U.S.C. §§ 2705 (a), 2711(b). Regulations passed pursuant to the IGRA state that such contracts “shall become effective upon approval by the Chairman,” 25 C.”
Michigan Gambling Opposition (MichGO) v. Norton, 477 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2007). “'s Answer, at ¶ 27 ("The Tribe admits that the NIGC has concluded that gaming will be permitted on the land once it is taken into trust as the Tribe’s initial reservation under IGRA.”
United States Ex Rel. John Yellow Bird Steele v. Turn Key Gaming, Inc. Wayne Barber, 135 F.3d 1249 (8th Cir. 1998). “In its answer, the Tribe claimed that the temporary contracts were invalid under 25 U.S.C. §§ 2705 (a)(4) and 2711 (1994) (requiring NIGC approval of management contracts relating to Indian gaming).”
Davids v. Coyhis, 869 F. Supp. 1401 (E.D. Wis. 1994). “25 U.S.C. §§ 2705 , 2713. The NIGC also has authority to monitor and inspect Class II gaming.”
Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band Indians, 223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “Moreover, it is the content of these agreements-the respective rights and obligations contained therein-that triggers the IGRA protective scheme, not how the parties treat such agreements.”
Bruce H. Lien Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 93 F.3d 1412 (8th Cir. 1996). “25 U.S.C. § 2705 . Prior to the time the NIGC was organized and its regulations promulgated, the Secretary of Interior was granted the interim authority for supervision of Indian gaming.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.