U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 32— NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION

25 U.S.C. § 3004

Summary for unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and cultural patrimony

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

Each Federal agency or museum which has possession or control over holdings or collections of Native American unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony shall provide a written summary of such objects based upon available information held by such agency or museum. The summary shall describe the scope of the collection, kinds of objects included, reference to geographical location, means and period of acquisition and cultural affiliation, where readily ascertainable.

(b) Requirements(1) The summary required under subsection (a) shall be—(A) in lieu of an object-by-object inventory;(B) followed by consultation with tribal government and Native Hawaiian organization officials and traditional religious leaders; and(C) completed by not later than the date that is 3 years after November 16, 1990.(2) Upon request, Indian Tribes 11 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized. and Native Hawaiian organizations shall have access to records, catalogues, relevant studies or other pertinent data for the limited purposes of determining the geographic origin, cultural affiliation, and basic facts surrounding acquisition and accession of Native American objects subject to this section. Such information shall be provided in a reasonable manner to be agreed upon by all parties.(Pub. L. 101–601, § 6, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3053.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2011 · leading case: State v. Taylor, 269 P.3d 740 (Haw. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Taylor, 269 P.3d 740 (Haw. 2011). · cites it 6× “25 U.S.C. § 3004 requires agencies or museums with "holdings or collections of Native American unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony " to complete a summary of these items "in lieu of an object-by-object inventory[,]" and to describe the…”
Pueblo of San Ildefonso v. Daniel Ridlon & Regents of the Univ. of California, 103 F.3d 936 (10th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3× “*939 On appeal the Pueblo contends that the district court’s reliance on the ownership provision was misplaced because the Pueblo brought its claim under NAGPRA’s repatriation provisions, 25 U.S.C. §§ 3004 and 3005, which are not limited to items found on federal lands after…”
San Ildefonso v. Ridlon (10th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3× “On appeal the Pueblo contends that the district court’s reliance on the -5- ownership provision was misplaced because the Pueblo brought its claim under NAGPRA’s repatriation provisions, 25 U.S.C. §§ 3004 and 3005, which are not limited to items found on federal lands after…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.