25 U.S.C. § 3010
Special relationship between Federal Government and Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations
This chapter reflects the unique relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations and should not be construed to establish a precedent with respect to any other individual, organization or foreign government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1995–2004 · leading case: Bonnichsen v. United States, Dep't of the Army, 969 F. Supp. 614 (D. Or. 1997).
Bonnichsen v. United States, Dep't of the Army, 969 F. Supp. 614 (D. Or. 1997). “25 U.S.C. § 3010 (the procedures established by NAGPRA reflects the unique relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes and should not be construed to establish a precedent with respect to any other individual, organization or foreign government).”
Arakaki v. Lingle, 305 F. Supp. 2d 1161 (D. Haw. 2004). “For example, 25 U.S.C. § 3010 states: “This chapter reflects the unique relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations and should not be construed to establish a precedent with respect to any other individual, organization or…”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 209 F. Supp. 2d 1008 (D.S.D. 2002). “See 25 U.S.C. § 3010 (recognizing that NAGPRA reflects the “unique relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes”).”
Na Iwi O Na Kupuna O Mokapu v. Dalton, 894 F. Supp. 1397 (D. Haw. 1995). “25 U.S.C. § 3010 . The court disagrees with Hui Malama's assertion that Section 3010 establishes a trust or fiduciary relationship between the government and Hui Malama.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.