The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized, in his discretion, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to collect reasonable fees to cover the cost of any and all work performed for Indian tribes or for individual Indians, to be paid by vendees, lessees, or assignees, or deducted from the proceeds of sale, leases, or other sources of revenue: Provided, That the amounts so collected shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, except when the expenses of the work are paid from Indian tribal funds, in which event they shall be credited to such funds.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (1983).
· cites it 2× “25 U. S. C. § 413 . Sections 406 and 407, as amended in 1964, both provide for deductions of administrative expenses "to the extent permissible under section 413.”
United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535 (1980).
· cites it 2× “§§ 406 , 407 (sale of timber); 25 U. S. C. § 413 (collection of administrative expenses incurred on behalf of Indians); 25 U.”
Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 625 (Ct. Cl. 1973).
· cites it 4× “The amended provision incorporated a reference to the 1920 Act ( 25 U.S.C. § 413 ) and provided that — - The timber on any Indian land held under a trust or other patent containing restrictions on alienations may be sold by the owner or owners with the consent of the Secretary…”
Mitchell v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 95 (Ct. Cl. 1979).
“§§ 318a, 323-25 (1976) (concerning roads and rights of way); 25 U.”
Cobell v. Kempthorne, 532 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2008).
“See generally 25 U.S.C. § 413 . Interior represented at trial that “[i]n large part, for most of our program [sic], we don’t charge fees,” Tr.”
United States v. Eastman, 118 F.2d 421 (9th Cir. 1941).
“415, 25 U.S.C.A. § 413 . That act provides, among other things, that on the sale of timber on Indian allotments the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to charge a reasonable fee incident to the sale of the timber or in the administration of Indian forests, the fee to be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.