25 U.S.C. § 450b
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 83
cases, 1978–2019 · leading case: Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005).
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “" Brief for Federal Parties 7; see 25 U. S. C. §§ 450b(f)-(g). The first case before us concerns Shoshone-Paiute contracts for FYs 1996 and 1997 and a Cherokee Nation contract for 1997.”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) ("`indirect cost rate' means the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate Federal agency"); S.”
Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450b©. The Tribe applied for a self-determination contract under § 450f(a)(l)(E), claiming that TANF is a program for the benefit of Indians because of their status as Indians.”
Council for Tribal Emp. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 450b(Z) (emphasis added). ISDA sets forth a model agreement that must be contained within, or incorporated by reference in, any self-determination contract entered into pursuant to 25 U.”
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) (defining the term “indirect cost rate” as “the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate [fjederal agency”); see also, e.”
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “The Board is a Navajo "tribal organization" within the meaning of 25 U. S. C. § 450b(c), 88 Stat. 2204 . With funds provided by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Navajo Indian Tribe, the Board operated a school in the abandoned public school facility, thus…”
Ford v. Moore, 1996 SD 112 (S.D. 1996). “] *854 25 U.S.C. § 450b( l )(1994)(emphasis added).”
Ronald Colbert v. United States, 785 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 2015). “” 9 25 U.S.C. § 450b. For purposes of ISDEAA, “Indian contractor” necessarily refers to a member of an Indian tribe, or “a tribe-related organization that may itself enter into a self-determination contract” as opposed to a private party.”
Cook Inlet Native Ass'n v. Bowen, 810 F.2d 1471 (9th Cir. 1987). “] which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; ____” 25 U.S.C. § 450b(b). In interpreting the definition, the Secretaries have recognized the defendant/appellee, Cook Inlet…”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). “The ISDA defines the term indirect contract support cost as those “costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one contract objective or which are not readily assignable to the contract objectives specifically benefited without effort disproportionate to…”
J.L. Ward Assocs., Inc. v. Great Plains Tribal Chairmen's Health Bd., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (D.S.D. 2012). “ermination contract” is a "contract (or grant or cooperative agreement utilized under section 450e-l of this title) entered into under part A of this subchapter between a tribal organization and the appropriate secretary for the planning, conduct and administration of programs…”
James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai Coll. Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, 434 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2006). “Chapa-De had been authorized by the Rumsey Indian Ranchería, a federally recognized tribe, and was a “tribal organization” for purposes of the Indian Self Determination Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450b(l). None of its board of directors was a member of the Rumsey Tribe, although there were…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(1) — 2 cases
Sage v. Sicangu Oyate Ho. Inc., 473 N.W.2d 480 (S.D. 1991).
N. Arapaho Tribe v. LaCounte, 215 F. Supp. 3d 987 (D. Mont. 2016).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(I) — 1 case
Demontiney v. United States ex rel. Dep't of Interior, 255 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 2001).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(Z) — 2 cases
Council for Tribal Emp. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 450b(Z) (emphasis added). ISDA sets forth a model agreement that must be contained within, or incorporated by reference in, any self-determination contract entered into pursuant to 25 U.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1140 (D.N.M. 2015).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(a) — 2 cases
Wacondo v. Concha, 873 P.2d 276 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994).
Diane Zarr v. Earl Barlow, Dir., Off. of Indian Educ. Programs, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 800 F.2d 1484 (9th Cir. 1986).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(b) — 6 cases
Cook Inlet Native Ass'n v. Bowen, 810 F.2d 1471 (9th Cir. 1987). “] which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; ____” 25 U.S.C. § 450b(b). In interpreting the definition, the Secretaries have recognized the defendant/appellee, Cook Inlet…”
Native Vill. of Stevens v. Alaska Mgmt. & Plan., 757 P.2d 32 (Alaska 1988).
Miami Nation of Indians of Indiana, Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 255 F.3d 342 (7th Cir. 2001).
Gibson v. Babbitt, 72 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (S.D. Fla. 1999).
Cogo v. Cent. Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indians, 465 F. Supp. 1286 (D. Alaska 1979).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(c) — 7 cases
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “The Board is a Navajo "tribal organization" within the meaning of 25 U. S. C. § 450b(c), 88 Stat. 2204 . With funds provided by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Navajo Indian Tribe, the Board operated a school in the abandoned public school facility, thus…”
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002).
Blaze Constr., Inc. v. Crownpoint Inst. of Tech., 7 Navajo Rptr. 296 (1997).
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd. Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue, 625 P.2d 1225 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980).
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 269 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2001).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(d) — 3 cases
Kahawaiolaa v. Norton, 386 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2004).
Schmasow v. Native Am. Ctr., 1999 MT 49 (Mont. 1999).
Kahawaiolaa v. Norton, 222 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (D. Haw. 2002).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(d)(e) — 1 case
Schmasow v. Native Am. Ctr., 1999 MT 49 (Mont. 1999).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(e) — 17 cases
Ronald Colbert v. United States, 785 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 2015). “” 9 25 U.S.C. § 450b. For purposes of ISDEAA, “Indian contractor” necessarily refers to a member of an Indian tribe, or “a tribe-related organization that may itself enter into a self-determination contract” as opposed to a private party.”
Greene v. Rhode Island, 398 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 2005).
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. United States, 195 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2002).
Schmasow v. Native Am. Ctr., 1999 MT 49 (Mont. 1999).
Council for Tribal Emp. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 450b(Z) (emphasis added). ISDA sets forth a model agreement that must be contained within, or incorporated by reference in, any self-determination contract entered into pursuant to 25 U.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(f) — 6 cases
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “" Brief for Federal Parties 7; see 25 U. S. C. §§ 450b(f)-(g). The first case before us concerns Shoshone-Paiute contracts for FYs 1996 and 1997 and a Cherokee Nation contract for 1997.”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). “The ISDA defines the term indirect contract support cost as those “costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one contract objective or which are not readily assignable to the contract objectives specifically benefited without effort disproportionate to…”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, 112 F.3d 1455 (10th Cir. 1997).
Cherokee Nation v. Thompson, 311 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2002).
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 269 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2001).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) — 2 cases
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) (defining the term “indirect cost rate” as “the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate [fjederal agency”); see also, e.”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) ("`indirect cost rate' means the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate Federal agency"); S.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(h) — 4 cases
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) ("`indirect cost rate' means the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate Federal agency"); S.”
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States, 577 F. Supp. 2d 382 (D.D.C. 2008). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) (defining the term “indirect cost rate” as “the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate [fjederal agency”); see also, e.”
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States of Am., 841 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2012).
Demontiney v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 780 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(i) — 11 cases
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016).
Council for Tribal Emp. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “25 U.S.C. § 450b(Z) (emphasis added). ISDA sets forth a model agreement that must be contained within, or incorporated by reference in, any self-determination contract entered into pursuant to 25 U.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1140 (D.N.M. 2015).
Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 285 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2002).
S. Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt, 497 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (D.N.M. 2007).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(j) — 22 cases
Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005). “" Brief for Federal Parties 7; see 25 U. S. C. §§ 450b(f)-(g). The first case before us concerns Shoshone-Paiute contracts for FYs 1996 and 1997 and a Cherokee Nation contract for 1997.”
Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “” 25 U.S.C. § 450b©. The Tribe applied for a self-determination contract under § 450f(a)(l)(E), claiming that TANF is a program for the benefit of Indians because of their status as Indians.”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar, 644 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2011). “See 25 U.S.C. § 450b(g) ("`indirect cost rate' means the rate arrived at through negotiation between an Indian tribe or tribal organization and the appropriate Federal agency"); S.”
Hinsley Ex Rel. K.M. v. Standing Rock Child Prot. Servs., 516 F.3d 668 (8th Cir. 2008).
Demontiney v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 780 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(j)(1995) — 1 case
Ford v. Moore, 1996 SD 112 (S.D. 1996). “] *854 25 U.S.C. § 450b( l )(1994)(emphasis added).”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(l) — 9 cases
James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai Coll. Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, 434 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2006). “Chapa-De had been authorized by the Rumsey Indian Ranchería, a federally recognized tribe, and was a “tribal organization” for purposes of the Indian Self Determination Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450b(l). None of its board of directors was a member of the Rumsey Tribe, although there were…”
J.L. Ward Assocs., Inc. v. Great Plains Tribal Chairmen's Health Bd., 842 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (D.S.D. 2012). “ermination contract” is a "contract (or grant or cooperative agreement utilized under section 450e-l of this title) entered into under part A of this subchapter between a tribal organization and the appropriate secretary for the planning, conduct and administration of programs…”
Sage v. Sicangu Oyate Ho. Inc., 473 N.W.2d 480 (S.D. 1991).
Giedosh v. Little Wound Sch. Bd., Inc., 995 F. Supp. 1052 (D.S.D. 1997).
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. Kempthorne, 630 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (E.D. Okla. 2009).
— 25 U.S.C. § 450b(l)(1997) — 1 case
Wright v. Prairie Chicken, 1998 SD 46 (S.D. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.