25 U.S.C. § 450i
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013).
Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). “Like all self-determination contracts following the model agreement set forth in 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c), the Contract here is designed as an overarching document that defines the parties’ relationship, while they negotiate annually the amount to be paid.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “at 1316 (citing 25 U.S.C. §§ 450i, 460k(a)(l)). Accordingly, nearly every significant amendment that Congress has made to the ISDEA since its inception reflects a desire to curtail the DOI and HHS Secretaries’ authority to administer ISDEA contracts, and to expand tribes and…”
Red Lake Band v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2009). “at 12 (citing 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c)), that does not mean that the Contract’s plain language may be ignored.”
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Rhoades, 755 F. Supp. 1484 (D.N.M. 1990). “Defendants contend that his status has changed because he was converted 10 to the competitive service soon after the enactment of 25 U.S.C. § 450i(m). 11 However, neither the language of the provision nor the legislative history 12 gives a clear indication that the amendment was…”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016). “An ISDEAA contract proposal typically consists of two parts: (i) a multi-year agreement that satisfies 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c); and (ii) an AFA. See 25 U.”
Colorado Gen. Assembly v. Lamm, 738 P.2d 1156 (Colo. 1987). “II, 1972); Indian Self Determination Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450i (Supp. V, 1975); Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 42 U.”
Boney v. Valline, 597 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Nev. 2009). “§ 2680 (h) further bolsters the Court’s position that such a tribal officer (at least a tribal officer who does not have a SLEC and is enforcing tribal law) cannot be considered a federal actor for purposes of Bivens . The Court’s position is also strengthened by Congress’s…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chapa De Indian Health Prog., Inc., 316 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2003). “§§ 3371 , 3372, and 25 U.S.C. § 450i(e) (federal rights and benefits extended to federal employee working for tribal organization if employee and organization so elect); 25 U.”
Tribe v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 2011). “” Ramah Navajo Chapter, 644 F.3d at 1076 .”
Application of 18 U.S.C. §§ 203 & 205 to Fed. Employees Detailed to State & Local Governments (OLC 1980). “25 U.S.C. §450i(f). (Section 207 o f T itle 18 imposes certain restrictions on form er governm ent employees* appearances before governm ent agencies.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c) — 5 cases
Red Lake Band v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2009). “at 12 (citing 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c)), that does not mean that the Contract’s plain language may be ignored.”
Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). “Like all self-determination contracts following the model agreement set forth in 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c), the Contract here is designed as an overarching document that defines the parties’ relationship, while they negotiate annually the amount to be paid.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016). “An ISDEAA contract proposal typically consists of two parts: (i) a multi-year agreement that satisfies 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c); and (ii) an AFA. See 25 U.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “at 1316 (citing 25 U.S.C. §§ 450i, 460k(a)(l)). Accordingly, nearly every significant amendment that Congress has made to the ISDEA since its inception reflects a desire to curtail the DOI and HHS Secretaries’ authority to administer ISDEA contracts, and to expand tribes and…”
Boney v. Valline, 597 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Nev. 2009). “§ 2680 (h) further bolsters the Court’s position that such a tribal officer (at least a tribal officer who does not have a SLEC and is enforcing tribal law) cannot be considered a federal actor for purposes of Bivens . The Court’s position is also strengthened by Congress’s…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c)(e)(2) — 1 case
Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 945 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2013). “Like all self-determination contracts following the model agreement set forth in 25 U.S.C. § 450i(c), the Contract here is designed as an overarching document that defines the parties’ relationship, while they negotiate annually the amount to be paid.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450i(e) — 1 case
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chapa De Indian Health Prog., Inc., 316 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2003). “§§ 3371 , 3372, and 25 U.S.C. § 450i(e) (federal rights and benefits extended to federal employee working for tribal organization if employee and organization so elect); 25 U.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450i(f) — 1 case
Application of 18 U.S.C. §§ 203 & 205 to Fed. Employees Detailed to State & Local Governments (OLC 1980). “25 U.S.C. §450i(f). (Section 207 o f T itle 18 imposes certain restrictions on form er governm ent employees* appearances before governm ent agencies.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450i(m) — 1 case
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Rhoades, 755 F. Supp. 1484 (D.N.M. 1990). “Defendants contend that his status has changed because he was converted 10 to the competitive service soon after the enactment of 25 U.S.C. § 450i(m). 11 However, neither the language of the provision nor the legislative history 12 gives a clear indication that the amendment was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.