25 U.S.C. § 450k

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997).
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). · cites it 6× “§ 450j-l(a) and (g) by not fully funding approved administrative functions (Complaint, ¶¶ 72-74 (Sixth Cause of Action)) and violates 25 U.S.C. § 450k by imposing a no-nregulatory requirement relating to self-determination contracting (Complaint, ¶¶ 75-78 (Seventh Cause of…”
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). · cites it 2× “2212 , 25 U. S. C. § 450k. Pursuant to this authority, the Secretary has promulgated detailed and comprehensive regulations respecting "school construction for previously private *841 schools now controlled and operated by tribes or tribally approved Indian organizations.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(prohibiting the HHS Secretary from promulgating any regulation or imposing any nonregulatory requirement on a Tribal' self-determination contract outside of narrow exceptions).”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a). 4 The ISDA took the extraordinary step of requiring the IHS, operated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, to turn over the direct operation of its federal programs to any Indian tribe which elects to run those programs for its…”
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, 112 F.3d 1455 (10th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “Congress also amended 25 U.S.C. § 450k, entitled “Rules and regulations.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016). “C£ 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(prohibiting the HHS Secretary from promulgating any regulation or imposing any non-regulatory requirement on a Tribal self-determination contract outside of narrow exceptions).”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(1983). Their failure to adequately enact regulations that transferred their contracting authority to American Indian tribes, however, ultimately motivated Congress to amend the ISDEA twice — first in 1988 and again in 1994.”
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Michael Houdyshell, 50 F.4th 662 (8th Cir. 2022). “[25 U.S.C. § 450k] empowers the Secretary to promulgate regulations to accomplish the purposes of the [Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance] Act.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 269 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2001). “This is an internal agency guideline adopted pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(l) and 25 C.F.R. § 900.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 279 F.3d 660 (9th Cir. 2002). “This is an internal agency guideline adopted pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(l) and 25 C.F.R. § 900.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a) — 4 cases
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (D.N.M. 2016). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(prohibiting the HHS Secretary from promulgating any regulation or imposing any nonregulatory requirement on a Tribal' self-determination contract outside of narrow exceptions).”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (E.D. Okla. 2001). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a). 4 The ISDA took the extraordinary step of requiring the IHS, operated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, to turn over the direct operation of its federal programs to any Indian tribe which elects to run those programs for its…”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “§ 450j-l(a) and (g) by not fully funding approved administrative functions (Complaint, ¶¶ 72-74 (Sixth Cause of Action)) and violates 25 U.S.C. § 450k by imposing a no-nregulatory requirement relating to self-determination contracting (Complaint, ¶¶ 75-78 (Seventh Cause of…”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016). “C£ 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(prohibiting the HHS Secretary from promulgating any regulation or imposing any non-regulatory requirement on a Tribal self-determination contract outside of narrow exceptions).”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(1983) — 1 case
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(1983). Their failure to adequately enact regulations that transferred their contracting authority to American Indian tribes, however, ultimately motivated Congress to amend the ISDEA twice — first in 1988 and again in 1994.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(l) — 3 cases
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala, 988 F. Supp. 1306 (D. Or. 1997). “§ 450j-l(a) and (g) by not fully funding approved administrative functions (Complaint, ¶¶ 72-74 (Sixth Cause of Action)) and violates 25 U.S.C. § 450k by imposing a no-nregulatory requirement relating to self-determination contracting (Complaint, ¶¶ 75-78 (Seventh Cause of…”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 269 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2001). “This is an internal agency guideline adopted pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(l) and 25 C.F.R. § 900.”
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 279 F.3d 660 (9th Cir. 2002). “This is an internal agency guideline adopted pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 450k(a)(l) and 25 C.F.R. § 900.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 450k(b) — 1 case
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, 112 F.3d 1455 (10th Cir. 1997). “Congress also amended 25 U.S.C. § 450k, entitled “Rules and regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.