25 U.S.C. § 450m
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1985–2016 · leading case: Weatherwax on Behalf of Carlson v. Fairbanks, 619 F. Supp. 294 (D. Mont. 1985).
Weatherwax on Behalf of Carlson v. Fairbanks, 619 F. Supp. 294 (D. Mont. 1985). “§ 1361 , to exercise the discretion vested in the Secretary, under § 109 of the Indian Self Determination Act (the “ISDA”), 25 U.S.C. § 450m, to rescind any contract or grant existing between the Secretary and the Blackfeet Tribe under authority of § 104 of the ISDA, 25 U.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 100 F. Supp. 3d 1122 (D.N.M. 2015). “Reply at 13 (quoting 25 U.S.C. § 450m)(al-terations in Reply but not § 450m).”
Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 132 S. Ct. 2181 (2012). “Congress expressly provided in ISDA that tribal contractors were entitled to sue for “money dam- ages” under the Contract Disputes Act upon the Govern- ment’s failure to pay, 25 U. S. C. §§450m–1(a), (d), and judgments against the Government under that Act are payable from the…”
Keen v. United States, 981 F. Supp. 679 (D.D.C. 1997). “2 In summary, the Plaintiffs contend that the BIA’s reassumption of the law enforcement program is invalid because the BIA did not follow the procedures required by 25 U.S.C. § 450m (1994), 3 for the reassumption of the Law Enforcement Program, and that as a result of this…”
United States v. Ross Allen Doherty, 126 F.3d 769 (6th Cir. 1997). “3 The Bureau of Indian Affairs, which is charged under 25 U.S.C. § 450m with ensuring that the tribes perform their obligations under federal contracts in accordance with ICRA, has also recognized that a wholesale incorporation of federal constitutional standards would be unwise.”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “25 U.S.C. § 450m~l(a). Here, it is clear that negotiations between the parties broke down in the weeks prior to Maniilaq’s lease proposal.”
Pueblo of Zuni v. United States, 467 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (D.N.M. 2006). “Statutory Authority to Bypass Exhaustion Plaintiff next proposes that the express language in 25 U.S.C. § 450m~l authorizes a tribal contractor to bypass administrative exhaustion.”
Navajo Health Found.-Sage Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Burwell, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (D.N.M. 2016). “A federal agency within the HHS or the DOI may unilaterally reassume a contract on either an emergency or non-emergency basis.”
Flathead Jt. Bd. of Control of Flathead v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 287 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “, 25 U.S.C. § 450m; Contract between the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (October 1, 1991).”
Wright v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 54 (Fed. Cl. 1994). “§ 403 (1988) (dealing with leases of Indian lands held under a trust patent); 25 U.S.C. § 450m (Supp. V 1993) (dealing with the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to rescind certain Indian contracts).”
Aleutian Pribilof Islands Ass'n v. Kempthorne, 537 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008). “For the reasons explained below, the Court does not reach the merits of APIA’S ISDEAA claims in this Memorandum Opinion, and *7 therefore does not resolve the Parties’ dispute concerning the applicable standard of review under that statute.”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014). “§ 1331 and 25 U.S.C. § 450m–1(a) (“The United States district courts shall have original jurisdiction over any civil action or claim 2 The regulations implementing § 450j(l)(1) explain the possible options for compensation for a § 450j(l)(1) lease, which include rent,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.