25 U.S.C. § 452
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1962–2013 · leading case: Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982).
Ramah Navajo Sch. Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM, 458 U.S. 832 (1982). “596 (1934), 25 U. S. C. § 452 et seq.; Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act, 64 Stat.”
Samish Indian Nation v. United States, 419 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “596 ), as amended [ 25 U.S.C. §§ 452 et seq.]; (B) which the Secretary is authorized to administer for the benefit of Indi *1366 ans under the Act of November 2, 1921 ( 42 Stat.”
Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Sec'y, 325 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2003). “at (E), and illustrate the types of initiatives that constitute “programs or services which are otherwise provided to Indian tribes and their members pursuant to Federal law,” 25 U.S.C. § 450b(j). The final two categories spell out more general requirements for…”
Organized Vill. of Kake v. Egan, 369 U.S. 60 (1962). “596 , 25 U. S. C. § 452 . During the 1940's several States were permitted to assert criminal jurisdiction, and sometimes civil jurisdiction as *74 well, over certain Indian reservations.”
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Kenneth Salazar, 708 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “” 25 U.S.C. § 452 . 12 . In fact, evidence that members of the Verona Band were alive in 1989 and participating in Muwekma activities relates more to the genealogical considerations of section 83.”
Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 (1974). “Part 21 relates to the program under which the Commissioner “may negotiate with State, territory, county or other Federal welfare agencies for such agencies to provide welfare services as contemplated” by 25 U. S. C. § 452 . The regulations state that the program applies to…”
Meyers Ex Rel. Meyers v. Bd. of Educ., 905 F. Supp. 1544 (D. Utah 1995). “See 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 452 -458e. The Indian Education Act (codified as amended at 25 U.”
Tsosie v. United States, 452 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2006). “596 (1934), 25 U.S.C. § 452 *1166 et seq., which directed that health services be made available to all members of federally recognized tribes; (3) the Transfer Act, 68 Stat.”
Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated Sch. Sys., 536 P.2d 793 (Alaska 1975). “25 U.S.C. § 452 (1963). [8] Alaska State Board of Education, The Big Picture on Small Schools 2 (1972).”
Vernon Solomon v. Interior Reg'l Hous. Auth., 313 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 2002). “596 ), as amended[ 25 U.S.C.A. § 452 et seq.], or any other Act authorizing Federal contracts with or grants to Indian organizations or for the benefit of Indians, shall require that to the greatest extent feasible— (1) preferences and opportunities for training and employment…”
White v. Califano, 437 F. Supp. 543 (D.S.D. 1977). “25 U.S.C. § 452 . In 1947 Congress further expanded the options open to B.”
State v. McCoy, 387 P.2d 942 (Wash. 1963). “596 , 25 U.S.C. § 452 . During the 1940's several States were permitted to assert criminal jurisdiction, and sometimes civil jurisdiction as well, over certain Indian reservations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.