25 U.S.C. § 458aaa

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016).
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “” 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa- *248 11(f); see also 25 C.”
Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. 251 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “711, codified at 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa. 6 . Defendant states that on April 20, 2007, IHS sent a letter to Bristol Bay, stating that it needed additional time to decide its claims.”
Barron v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 373 F. Supp. 3d 1232 (D. Alaska 2019). “Docket 11-1 at 2; Docket 11-2 at 7, 16-17. Titles I and V of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act were originally codified at 25 U.”
Demontiney v. United States ex rel. Dep't of Interior, 255 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “711 (2000) (codified primarily at 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa et seq.). There is no indication that Congress intended the ISDEAA amendments to be given retroactive effect; the amendments state that "[ejxcept as otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act shall take effect on the date…”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius, 72 F. Supp. 3d 227 (D.D.C. 2014). “Plaintiff Maniilaq Association (“Manii-laq” or “plaintiff’) administers healthcare systems through a self-determination compact and annual funding agreements under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEAA”), 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa et seq. The plaintiff is…”
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Sebelius (D.D.C. 2014). “Plaintiff is seeking a declaration that a lease with the Indian Health Service (“IHS” or “defendant”) for one of the clinics Maniilaq operates under its self-determination contract is incorporated into Maniilaq’s 2013 funding agreement as a matter of law.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa(b) — 1 case
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa- *248 11(f); see also 25 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.