25 U.S.C. § 478

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases, 1957–2016 · leading case: Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc. v. United States, 841 F.3d 556 (2d Cir. 2016).
Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc. v. United States, 841 F.3d 556 (2d Cir. 2016). · cites it 3× “984 , 988 (1934) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 478 ). *562 The IRA’s implementing regulations, promulgated by the U.”
United States v. George Anderson, 625 F.2d 910 (9th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “988 [ 25 U.S.C. § 478 ], that: • This Act shall not apply to any reservation wherein a majority of the adult Indians, voting at a special election duly called by the Secretary of the Interior, shall vote against its application.”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne, 497 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “” See also 25 U.S.C. § 478 (requiring elections to be held “within one year after June 18, 1934”).”
United States v. John, 437 U.S. 634 (1978). “988 , 25 U. S. C. § 478 (1976 ed.), to accept the provisions of the *646 Act.”
Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. S. Rhode Island Land Dev. Corp., 418 F. Supp. 798 (D.R.I. 1976). “Not only is incorporation under § 477 optional, 25 U.S.C. § 478 , even as to those Indians to whom it is available, but the statutory scheme of which it is a part was first enacted in 1934, long after the latest reenactment of the Nonintercourse Act took place in 1834.”
Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 919 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D.D.C. 2013). “” See 25 U.S.C. § 478 (“This Act shall not apply to any reservation wherein a majority of the adult Indians, voting at a special election duly called by the Secretary of the Interior, shall vote against its application.”
Tiffany Aguayo v. S.M.R. Jewell, 827 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2016). “” 25 U.S.C. § 478 . The parties do not dispute that when the Pala Band held such an election in 1934, it voted against becoming an IRA tribe.”
Beulah Chase v. Roland McMasters Jack Smith, Jr., Wayne Turner, Arlyn Wadholm & Russel Pederson, 573 F.2d 1011 (8th Cir. 1978). “The Three Affiliated Tribes voted to have the Indian Reorganization Act apply to them, see 25 U.S.C. § 478 , and have adopted a Constitution and By-Laws under § 476 of the Act.”
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Navajo Tribe of Indians, 471 U.S. 195 (1985). “25 U. S. C. §478 . Many tribal constitutions written under the IRA in the 1930’s called for Secretarial approval of tax laws affecting non-Indians.”
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Cmty. of Oregon v. Jewell, 75 F. Supp. 3d 387 (D.D.C. 2014). “Section 18 states that the IRA “shall not apply to any reservation wherein a majority of the adult Indians .”
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States, 9 Cl. Ct. 336 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “The Navajo Tribe, pursuant to section 18 of the Act, 25 U.S.C. § 478 , voted against application of the provisions of the Act to the Navajo Reservation.”
Carcieri v. Kempthorne, 497 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “" See also 25 U.S.C. § 478 (requiring elections to be held "within one year after June 18, 1934").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.