25 U.S.C. § 483
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1955–2010 · leading case: Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky, 606 F.3d 994 (8th Cir. 2010).
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky, 606 F.3d 994 (8th Cir. 2010). “236 (1948) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 483 ) (Sales Act). The United States and the defendants ask us to uphold the district court rulings on these issues.”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky, 529 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (D.S.D. 2007). “§§ 461-77 ), referred to as “the 1934 Act”, such that all lands alienated to non-Indians after 1934 and prior to the 1948 Supervised Sales Act, 25 U.S.C. § 483 , are within the boundaries of the Yankton Sioux Reservation; (3) What lands are currently trust lands; (4) Are the…”
United States v. Mottaz, 476 U.S. 834 (1986). “236 , 25 U. S. C. §483 , the Secretary of the Interior “is authorized in his discretion, and upon application of the Indians owners .”
Florence Blacketter Mottaz, on Behalf of Herself & All Others Similarly Situated v. United States, 753 F.2d 71 (8th Cir. 1985). “In the early 1950’s, some, but not all, of the heirs with fractional holdings petitioned the Department of Interior, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 483 (1952), to sell their allotments.”
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Podhradsky, 577 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2009). “236 (1948) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 483 ) (Sales Act). The United States and the defendants ask us to uphold the district court rulings on these issues.”
Conroy v. Frizzell, 429 F. Supp. 918 (D.S.D. 1977). “25 U.S.C. § 483 ; 25 C.F.R. § 121.22 (a).”
Black Hills Inst. of Geological Rsch. v. United States, Dep't of Just., 812 F. Supp. 1015 (D.S.D. 1993). “Sale of land by individual Indian owners The Secretary of the Interior, or his duly authorized representative, is authorized in his discretion, and upon application of the Indian owners, to issue patents in fee, to remove restrictions against alienation, and to approve…”
In Re Emerald Outdoor Advert., L.L.C., 300 B.R. 775 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 2003). “25 U.S.C. § 483 (a) provides that individual owners of Indian trust lands such as Hargrove may execute a Deed of Trust and encumber the trust land “.”
Sampson v. Andrus, 483 F. Supp. 240 (D.S.D. 1980). “Whether Congress intended, in enacting 25 U.S.C. § 483 in 1948, to require the application of all Indian owners of an allotment before the allotment could be partitioned? *242 3.”
Oglala Sioux Tribe of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. Hallett, 708 F.2d 326 (8th Cir. 1983). “4 The court held that the Secretary had discretion to approve Tail’s application under 25 U.S.C. § 483 (1976), which was not affected by tribal ordinances to the contrary.”
Covelo Indian Cmty. v. Watt, 551 F. Supp. 366 (D.D.C. 1982). “Secretarial Sales of Allotments in Heirship Status (“Secretarial transfers”): Sales of inherited allotments on reservations were approved by BIA officials without the consent of all beneficial heirs as allegedly required by 25 U.S.C. § 483 . d. Unapproved Bights of Way: Road and…”
Black Hills Inst. of Geological Rsch. v. South Dakota Sch. of Mines & Tech., 12 F.3d 737 (8th Cir. 1993). “§ 464 and 25 U.S.C. § 483 is a matter of federal law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.