U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 45— PROTECTION OF INDIANS AND CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES

25 U.S.C. § 5126

Mandatory application of sections 5102 and 5124

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar
Notwithstanding section 5125 of this title, sections 5102 and 5124 of this title shall apply to—(1) all Indian tribes,(2) all lands held in trust by the United States for Indians, and(3) all lands owned by Indians that are subject to a restriction imposed by the United States on alienation of the rights of the Indians in the lands.(Pub. L. 101–301, § 3(a), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 207.)Editorial NotesCodification

Section was formerly classified to section 478–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2020–2021 · leading case: Paul Grondal v. United States, 21 F.4th 1140 (9th Cir. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Paul Grondal v. United States, 21 F.4th 1140 (9th Cir. 2021). “See 25 U.S.C. § 5126 . 3. The Legal Status of MA-8 and the BIA’s Standing to Sue on the IA’s Behalf The issues here involve interpretation of statutes and executive orders and are therefore reviewed de novo.”
Big Sandy Rancheria Enters. v. Rob Bonta, 1 F.4th 710 (9th Cir. 2021). “BONTA 19 B Congress enacted the Indian Reorganization Act to enable tribes “to revitalize their self-government through the adoption of constitutions and bylaws” under section 16 of the IRA, see 25 U.S.C. § 5126 , and “through the creation of chartered corporations, with the…”
Albrecht v. Cnty. of Riverside (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). “( 25 U.S.C. § 5126 .) However, section 5102 by its very terms applies only to “existing periods of trust,” extending those existing periods of trust indefinitely.”
Grondal v. United States of Am. (E.D. Wash. 2020). “” 25 U.S.C. §5126 . 14 The Court concludes that MA-8 is Indian land held in trust by the United 15 States for the benefit of the allottees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.