25 U.S.C. § 607
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1965–2009 · leading case: George Groundhog v. W. W. Keeler, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir. 1971).
George Groundhog v. W. W. Keeler, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir. 1971). “968 , 25 U.S.C. § 607 , which provided: “After August 9, 1946, only enrolled members of the Yakima Tribes of one-fourth or more blood of such *680 tribes shall take by inheritance or by will any interest in that part of the restricted or trust estate of a deceased member of such…”
Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F. Supp. 808 (E.D. Wash. 1965). “968 ( 25 U.S.C. § 607 ), § 7 of which provides: “After August 9, 1946, only enrolled members of the Yakima Tribes of one-fourth or more blood of such tribes shall take by inheritance or by will any interest in that part of the restricted or trust estate of a deceased member of…”
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 589 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “955 and 956 (the “Allotments”), obtained through a purchase made pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 607 (2006). The other named plaintiffs — the eighteen individual landowners, of whom seventeen are enrolled members of the Yakama Nation and one is an enrolled member of the Colville…”
Eskra v. Morton, 380 F. Supp. 205 (W.D. Wis. 1974). “The claimants sought to challenge the constitutionality of 25 U.S.C. § 607 , which limits inheritance of trust property of the Yakima Tribes to enrolled members who are at least “one-fourth blood” Yakima Indi *211 ans.”
Crawford v. Andrus, 472 F. Supp. 853 (D. Mont. 1979). “For example, in Simmons, supra, there was a dispute over the constitutionality of 25 U.S.C. § 607 , which concerns inheritance by members of the Yakima Tribes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.